@inbook{ebb19e0c8e5d484b8fa81f05d14ce58b,
title = "Effects of New Governancegovernance on Research in the Humanitieshumanities – The Example of Medieval Historymedieval history",
abstract = "The first section in the chapter presents the main lines of the discussion on the role of the humanities in the current research landscape and discusses the common assumptions which claim that new governance approaches put research in the humanities at a disadvantage and that they lead to their gradual reduction or cut back. The second section draws on longitudinal statistical data to verify whether the quota of external research funds in the humanities has decreased and whether the number of research posts was reduced. This analysis is conducted comparatively for four countries (D, A, NL, UK). As a case study of a specific subject within the humanities, the third section presents findings from interviews with researchers in medieval history. The interviews were conducted in the four countries mentioned above and focused on the question whether and how far new university management/governance approaches within universities affect the actual research activities of individual historians and how the researchers perceive the changes in their institutional environment. The concluding section discusses whether university management can really determine research activities in a top-down manner, which strategies of avoidance or adaptation researchers possibly develop and if perhaps supranational (EU) research policies and rationales play a role for the researchers{\textquoteright} strategies.",
keywords = "External Funding, German Case, Institutional Management, Problem Choice, Research Output",
author = "Kehm, \{Barbara M.\} and Liudvika Lei{\dh}yt{\"e}",
note = "Funding Information: The statistics about research grants provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the humanities changed their subject groupings in 2002 from a group called “history and arts” to a group called “humanities”. Figures on grants for “history and arts” are available until 2004, while the new grouping was introduced in 2002 and the latest figures include the year 2006. In absolute figures, the research grants from the DFG for “history and arts” increased from C32.3 million in 1996 to C52.8 million in 2004. In the category of “humanities”, the DFG funding increased from C62.4 million in 2002 to C78.2 million in 2006. Compared to the natural sciences, the life sciences, and engineering sciences, the DFG funding is lowest in the humanities and social sciences, but there has been a considerable increase over time in funding as well, from C132.4 million in 1994 to C211.4 million in 2006, with a clear dip in funding between 2002 and 2003. Still the extent of increase in funding was higher in the other subject groups than it was in the humanities and social sciences. The number of full-time professors in the humanities at German universities shows a similar decline as in Austria from 5,916 in 1997 to 5,561 in 2006, a minus of approximately 6\% (DFG 1998, 2002, 2006; Statistisches Bundesamt 1997, 2006). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2010, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.",
year = "2010",
month = jun,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-9139-0\_4",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-481-9138-3",
series = "Higher Education Dynamics",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "73--90",
editor = "Dorothea Jansen",
booktitle = "Governance and Performance in the German Public Research Sector",
address = "Germany",
}