eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health: A Review of the Current State

Hanneke Kip (Corresponding Author), Yvonne H.A. Bouman, Saskia M. Kelders, Lisette J.E.W.C. van Gemert-Pijnen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Treatment of offenders in forensic mental health is complex. Often, these in- or outpatients have low treatment motivation, suffer from multiple disorders, and have poor literacy skills. eHealth may be able to improve treatment outcomes because of its potential to increase motivation and engagement, and it can overcome the predominant one-size-fits-all approach by being tailored to individual patients.

Objective: To examine its potential, this systematic review studies the way that eHealth has been used and studied in forensic mental health and identifies accompanying advantages and disadvantages for both patients and treatment, including effectiveness.

Methods: A systematic search in Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed up until December 2017. Studies were included if they focused on technological interventions to improve the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.

Results: The search resulted in 50 studies in which eHealth was used for treatment purposes. Multiple types of studies and technologies were identified, such as virtual reality, web-based interventions, and videoconferencing. The results confirmed the benefits of technology, for example, the acquisition of unique information about offenders, effectiveness, and tailoring to specific characteristics, but indicated that these are not fully taken advantage of.

Discussion: To overcome the barriers and obtain the benefits, eHealth has to have a good fit with patients and the forensic psychiatric context. It has to be seamlessly integrated in existing care and should not be added as an isolated element. To bridge the gap between the current situation and eHealth’s potential, further research on development, implementation, and evaluation should be conducted.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume9
Issue number42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Mental Health
Forensic Psychiatry
Motivation
Videoconferencing
Technology
Therapeutics
Inpatients
Outpatients
Research

Cite this

@article{d6f0330c32994b11b6a1d6ca5bb3fe76,
title = "eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health: A Review of the Current State",
abstract = "Background: Treatment of offenders in forensic mental health is complex. Often, these in- or outpatients have low treatment motivation, suffer from multiple disorders, and have poor literacy skills. eHealth may be able to improve treatment outcomes because of its potential to increase motivation and engagement, and it can overcome the predominant one-size-fits-all approach by being tailored to individual patients.Objective: To examine its potential, this systematic review studies the way that eHealth has been used and studied in forensic mental health and identifies accompanying advantages and disadvantages for both patients and treatment, including effectiveness.Methods: A systematic search in Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed up until December 2017. Studies were included if they focused on technological interventions to improve the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.Results: The search resulted in 50 studies in which eHealth was used for treatment purposes. Multiple types of studies and technologies were identified, such as virtual reality, web-based interventions, and videoconferencing. The results confirmed the benefits of technology, for example, the acquisition of unique information about offenders, effectiveness, and tailoring to specific characteristics, but indicated that these are not fully taken advantage of.Discussion: To overcome the barriers and obtain the benefits, eHealth has to have a good fit with patients and the forensic psychiatric context. It has to be seamlessly integrated in existing care and should not be added as an isolated element. To bridge the gap between the current situation and eHealth’s potential, further research on development, implementation, and evaluation should be conducted.",
author = "Hanneke Kip and Bouman, {Yvonne H.A.} and Kelders, {Saskia M.} and {van Gemert-Pijnen}, {Lisette J.E.W.C.}",
note = "Open Access",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00042",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychiatry",
issn = "1664-0640",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "42",

}

eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health : A Review of the Current State. / Kip, Hanneke (Corresponding Author); Bouman, Yvonne H.A.; Kelders, Saskia M.; van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette J.E.W.C.

In: Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 9, No. 42, 21.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health

T2 - A Review of the Current State

AU - Kip, Hanneke

AU - Bouman, Yvonne H.A.

AU - Kelders, Saskia M.

AU - van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette J.E.W.C.

N1 - Open Access

PY - 2018/2/21

Y1 - 2018/2/21

N2 - Background: Treatment of offenders in forensic mental health is complex. Often, these in- or outpatients have low treatment motivation, suffer from multiple disorders, and have poor literacy skills. eHealth may be able to improve treatment outcomes because of its potential to increase motivation and engagement, and it can overcome the predominant one-size-fits-all approach by being tailored to individual patients.Objective: To examine its potential, this systematic review studies the way that eHealth has been used and studied in forensic mental health and identifies accompanying advantages and disadvantages for both patients and treatment, including effectiveness.Methods: A systematic search in Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed up until December 2017. Studies were included if they focused on technological interventions to improve the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.Results: The search resulted in 50 studies in which eHealth was used for treatment purposes. Multiple types of studies and technologies were identified, such as virtual reality, web-based interventions, and videoconferencing. The results confirmed the benefits of technology, for example, the acquisition of unique information about offenders, effectiveness, and tailoring to specific characteristics, but indicated that these are not fully taken advantage of.Discussion: To overcome the barriers and obtain the benefits, eHealth has to have a good fit with patients and the forensic psychiatric context. It has to be seamlessly integrated in existing care and should not be added as an isolated element. To bridge the gap between the current situation and eHealth’s potential, further research on development, implementation, and evaluation should be conducted.

AB - Background: Treatment of offenders in forensic mental health is complex. Often, these in- or outpatients have low treatment motivation, suffer from multiple disorders, and have poor literacy skills. eHealth may be able to improve treatment outcomes because of its potential to increase motivation and engagement, and it can overcome the predominant one-size-fits-all approach by being tailored to individual patients.Objective: To examine its potential, this systematic review studies the way that eHealth has been used and studied in forensic mental health and identifies accompanying advantages and disadvantages for both patients and treatment, including effectiveness.Methods: A systematic search in Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed up until December 2017. Studies were included if they focused on technological interventions to improve the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients.Results: The search resulted in 50 studies in which eHealth was used for treatment purposes. Multiple types of studies and technologies were identified, such as virtual reality, web-based interventions, and videoconferencing. The results confirmed the benefits of technology, for example, the acquisition of unique information about offenders, effectiveness, and tailoring to specific characteristics, but indicated that these are not fully taken advantage of.Discussion: To overcome the barriers and obtain the benefits, eHealth has to have a good fit with patients and the forensic psychiatric context. It has to be seamlessly integrated in existing care and should not be added as an isolated element. To bridge the gap between the current situation and eHealth’s potential, further research on development, implementation, and evaluation should be conducted.

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00042

DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00042

M3 - Review article

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry

JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry

SN - 1664-0640

IS - 42

ER -