TY - JOUR

T1 - Electron-density-based calculations of intermolecular energy: case of urea

AU - Suponitsky, Kyrill Yu.

AU - Tsirelson, Vladimir G.

AU - Feil, Dirk

AU - Feil, D.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - The intermolecular interaction energy in crystalline urea has been calculated both from diffraction data and from the Hartree-Fock crystalline electron-density distribution, using a modified atom-atom approximation scheme. The electrostatic part of this energy has been calculated from the atomic multipole moments, obtained by adjustment of the multipole model to experimental X-ray and to theoretical Hartree-Fock structure amplitudes. To obtain the induction energy, multipole moments were calculated from structure amplitudes for the crystalline electron density and from those that refer to the electron density of a superposition of isolated molecules. This worked well for the calculation of the interaction energy from Hartree-Fock data (6% difference from the sublimation-energy value), but not for the interaction energy from experimental data, where the moments of the superposition have to come from Hartree-Fock calculations: the two sets of multipole moments are far too different. The uncertainty of the phases of the structure amplitudes, combined with systematic errors in the theoretical data and noise in the experimental values, may account for the discrepancies. The nature of the different contributions to intermolecular interactions for urea is examined.

AB - The intermolecular interaction energy in crystalline urea has been calculated both from diffraction data and from the Hartree-Fock crystalline electron-density distribution, using a modified atom-atom approximation scheme. The electrostatic part of this energy has been calculated from the atomic multipole moments, obtained by adjustment of the multipole model to experimental X-ray and to theoretical Hartree-Fock structure amplitudes. To obtain the induction energy, multipole moments were calculated from structure amplitudes for the crystalline electron density and from those that refer to the electron density of a superposition of isolated molecules. This worked well for the calculation of the interaction energy from Hartree-Fock data (6% difference from the sublimation-energy value), but not for the interaction energy from experimental data, where the moments of the superposition have to come from Hartree-Fock calculations: the two sets of multipole moments are far too different. The uncertainty of the phases of the structure amplitudes, combined with systematic errors in the theoretical data and noise in the experimental values, may account for the discrepancies. The nature of the different contributions to intermolecular interactions for urea is examined.

KW - METIS-106337

KW - IR-59191

U2 - 10.1107/S0108767399001993

DO - 10.1107/S0108767399001993

M3 - Article

VL - A55

SP - 821

EP - 827

JO - Acta crystallographica Section A: Foundations of crystallography

JF - Acta crystallographica Section A: Foundations of crystallography

SN - 0108-7673

ER -