Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes

L. Nieth (Corresponding Author), P. Benneworth, D. Charles, L. Fonseca, C. Rodrigues, M. Salomaa, M. Stienstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Collaboration between regional stakeholders is increasingly emphasized in innovation policy as a way to activate the inherent agency in a regional innovation system. Partnerships of diverse stakeholders have been identified as critical, being able to envisage and implement future pathways that in turn bring change to a region. Thus, the knowledge of various stakeholders is supposed to be combined in novel ways in order to define regional assets and possible future pathways. Nevertheless, it has been recognized that these agency activation approaches often fail to realize these long-term visions initially agreed by partners. We here draw on Sotarauta’s notion of policy ‘black holes’, where regional partners repeat past superficial successes rather than driving in to systemic change. We seek to understand the conditions under which regional stakeholders can build realistic and adaptable strategies that shift regional development trajectories. We explore this via a qualitative approach comparing entrepreneurial discovery processes in three peripheral regions, namely Twente (Netherlands), Aveiro (Portugal) and Lincolnshire (UK). We reflect on the potential value of more effectual (opportunistic/ flexible) approaches to entrepreneurial discovery. We argue that black hole problems may arise from the way agency activation strategies conceptualize long-term strategy development, if partners’ mind-sets are too causal and lacking flexibility to continually reorient strategies during implementation better towards these collective visions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2147-2166
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean planning studies
Volume26
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 5 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

stakeholder
innovation
ecosystem
activation
peripheral region
innovation policy
development strategy
regional development
Portugal
assets
Netherlands
flexibility
trajectory
policy

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

@article{7a1c0946a827424c905196d703df012f,
title = "Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes",
abstract = "Collaboration between regional stakeholders is increasingly emphasized in innovation policy as a way to activate the inherent agency in a regional innovation system. Partnerships of diverse stakeholders have been identified as critical, being able to envisage and implement future pathways that in turn bring change to a region. Thus, the knowledge of various stakeholders is supposed to be combined in novel ways in order to define regional assets and possible future pathways. Nevertheless, it has been recognized that these agency activation approaches often fail to realize these long-term visions initially agreed by partners. We here draw on Sotarauta’s notion of policy ‘black holes’, where regional partners repeat past superficial successes rather than driving in to systemic change. We seek to understand the conditions under which regional stakeholders can build realistic and adaptable strategies that shift regional development trajectories. We explore this via a qualitative approach comparing entrepreneurial discovery processes in three peripheral regions, namely Twente (Netherlands), Aveiro (Portugal) and Lincolnshire (UK). We reflect on the potential value of more effectual (opportunistic/ flexible) approaches to entrepreneurial discovery. We argue that black hole problems may arise from the way agency activation strategies conceptualize long-term strategy development, if partners’ mind-sets are too causal and lacking flexibility to continually reorient strategies during implementation better towards these collective visions.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "L. Nieth and P. Benneworth and D. Charles and L. Fonseca and C. Rodrigues and M. Salomaa and M. Stienstra",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/09654313.2018.1530144",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "2147--2166",
journal = "European planning studies",
issn = "0965-4313",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "11",

}

Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems : Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes. / Nieth, L. (Corresponding Author); Benneworth, P.; Charles, D.; Fonseca, L.; Rodrigues, C.; Salomaa, M.; Stienstra, M.

In: European planning studies, Vol. 26, No. 11, 05.10.2018, p. 2147-2166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems

T2 - Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes

AU - Nieth, L.

AU - Benneworth, P.

AU - Charles, D.

AU - Fonseca, L.

AU - Rodrigues, C.

AU - Salomaa, M.

AU - Stienstra, M.

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018/10/5

Y1 - 2018/10/5

N2 - Collaboration between regional stakeholders is increasingly emphasized in innovation policy as a way to activate the inherent agency in a regional innovation system. Partnerships of diverse stakeholders have been identified as critical, being able to envisage and implement future pathways that in turn bring change to a region. Thus, the knowledge of various stakeholders is supposed to be combined in novel ways in order to define regional assets and possible future pathways. Nevertheless, it has been recognized that these agency activation approaches often fail to realize these long-term visions initially agreed by partners. We here draw on Sotarauta’s notion of policy ‘black holes’, where regional partners repeat past superficial successes rather than driving in to systemic change. We seek to understand the conditions under which regional stakeholders can build realistic and adaptable strategies that shift regional development trajectories. We explore this via a qualitative approach comparing entrepreneurial discovery processes in three peripheral regions, namely Twente (Netherlands), Aveiro (Portugal) and Lincolnshire (UK). We reflect on the potential value of more effectual (opportunistic/ flexible) approaches to entrepreneurial discovery. We argue that black hole problems may arise from the way agency activation strategies conceptualize long-term strategy development, if partners’ mind-sets are too causal and lacking flexibility to continually reorient strategies during implementation better towards these collective visions.

AB - Collaboration between regional stakeholders is increasingly emphasized in innovation policy as a way to activate the inherent agency in a regional innovation system. Partnerships of diverse stakeholders have been identified as critical, being able to envisage and implement future pathways that in turn bring change to a region. Thus, the knowledge of various stakeholders is supposed to be combined in novel ways in order to define regional assets and possible future pathways. Nevertheless, it has been recognized that these agency activation approaches often fail to realize these long-term visions initially agreed by partners. We here draw on Sotarauta’s notion of policy ‘black holes’, where regional partners repeat past superficial successes rather than driving in to systemic change. We seek to understand the conditions under which regional stakeholders can build realistic and adaptable strategies that shift regional development trajectories. We explore this via a qualitative approach comparing entrepreneurial discovery processes in three peripheral regions, namely Twente (Netherlands), Aveiro (Portugal) and Lincolnshire (UK). We reflect on the potential value of more effectual (opportunistic/ flexible) approaches to entrepreneurial discovery. We argue that black hole problems may arise from the way agency activation strategies conceptualize long-term strategy development, if partners’ mind-sets are too causal and lacking flexibility to continually reorient strategies during implementation better towards these collective visions.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

U2 - 10.1080/09654313.2018.1530144

DO - 10.1080/09654313.2018.1530144

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 2147

EP - 2166

JO - European planning studies

JF - European planning studies

SN - 0965-4313

IS - 11

ER -