TY - JOUR
T1 - Endophenotypes for intelligence in children and adolescents
AU - van Leeuwen, Marieke
AU - van den Berg, Stéphanie M.
AU - Hoekstra, Rosa A.
AU - Boomsma, Dorret I.
PY - 2007/7/1
Y1 - 2007/7/1
N2 - The aim of this study was to identify promising endophenotypes for intelligence in children and adolescents for future genetic studies in cognitive development. Based on the available set of endophenotypes for intelligence in adults, cognitive tasks were chosen covering the domains of working memory, processing speed, and selective attention. This set of tasks was assessed in a test-retest design in children and in adolescents. Working memory could be measured reliably using the n-back task and correlated with intelligence in both age groups. For processing speed, assessed with the Π-inspection time task and reaction time on the flanker task, test-retest reliability was good in both age groups, but processing speed only correlated significantly with intelligence in children. Selective attention, i.e., the effect of incongruent flankers on RT and accuracy, showed low reliability and neither correlated with intelligence in adolescents nor in children. Thus, working memory seems a promising endophenotype for intelligence in both children and adolescents. Inspection time and measures of selective attention based on the flanker task do not seem very promising endophenotypes for intelligence in these age groups.
AB - The aim of this study was to identify promising endophenotypes for intelligence in children and adolescents for future genetic studies in cognitive development. Based on the available set of endophenotypes for intelligence in adults, cognitive tasks were chosen covering the domains of working memory, processing speed, and selective attention. This set of tasks was assessed in a test-retest design in children and in adolescents. Working memory could be measured reliably using the n-back task and correlated with intelligence in both age groups. For processing speed, assessed with the Π-inspection time task and reaction time on the flanker task, test-retest reliability was good in both age groups, but processing speed only correlated significantly with intelligence in children. Selective attention, i.e., the effect of incongruent flankers on RT and accuracy, showed low reliability and neither correlated with intelligence in adolescents nor in children. Thus, working memory seems a promising endophenotype for intelligence in both children and adolescents. Inspection time and measures of selective attention based on the flanker task do not seem very promising endophenotypes for intelligence in these age groups.
KW - Development
KW - Processing speed
KW - Selective attention
KW - Test reliability
KW - Working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247141923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34247141923
SN - 0160-2896
VL - 35
SP - 369
EP - 380
JO - Intelligence
JF - Intelligence
IS - 4
ER -