Energy efficient process chain: The impact of cutting fluid strategies

Nadine Madanchi; Denis Kurle; Marius Winter; Sebastian Thiede; Christoph Herrmann

doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.056

Energy efficient process chain: The impact of cutting fluid strategies

Nadine Madanchi^*, Denis Kurle, Marius Winter, Sebastian Thiede, Christoph Herrmann

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Academic › peer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Machining processes can be realized using different cutting fluid strategies–flood, dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). The choice of each strategy directly influences the need of peripheral units (e.g. filter units) and additional processes within the process chain (e.g. washing). Thus, selecting an energy and resource efficient cutting fluid strategy depends not only on cutting fluid as a resource, but also on its inherent impact on the entire process chain. Therefore, this paper presents a method for decision support, considering technical boundary conditions and effects on the process chain layout as well as its application in a case study.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	360-365
Journal	Procedia CIRP
Volume	29
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.056
Publication status	Published - 2015
Externally published	Yes
Event	22nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LCE 2015 - Sidney, Australia Duration: 7 Apr 2015 → 9 Apr 2015 Conference number: 22

Keywords

Cutting fluid
Process chains
Energy efficiency

Access to Document

10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.056Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Madanchi2015energyFinal published version, 538 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{b1eb7bdadfff449985859ab1ba1fdd5a,

title = "Energy efficient process chain: The impact of cutting fluid strategies",

abstract = "Machining processes can be realized using different cutting fluid strategies–flood, dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). The choice of each strategy directly influences the need of peripheral units (e.g. filter units) and additional processes within the process chain (e.g. washing). Thus, selecting an energy and resource efficient cutting fluid strategy depends not only on cutting fluid as a resource, but also on its inherent impact on the entire process chain. Therefore, this paper presents a method for decision support, considering technical boundary conditions and effects on the process chain layout as well as its application in a case study.",

keywords = "Cutting fluid, Process chains, Energy efficiency",

author = "Nadine Madanchi and Denis Kurle and Marius Winter and Sebastian Thiede and Christoph Herrmann",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.056",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "360--365",

journal = "Procedia CIRP",

issn = "2212-8271",

publisher = "Elsevier",

note = "22nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LCE 2015, LCE ; Conference date: 07-04-2015 Through 09-04-2015",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy efficient process chain

T2 - 22nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LCE 2015

AU - Madanchi, Nadine

AU - Kurle, Denis

AU - Winter, Marius

AU - Thiede, Sebastian

AU - Herrmann, Christoph

N1 - Conference code: 22

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Machining processes can be realized using different cutting fluid strategies–flood, dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). The choice of each strategy directly influences the need of peripheral units (e.g. filter units) and additional processes within the process chain (e.g. washing). Thus, selecting an energy and resource efficient cutting fluid strategy depends not only on cutting fluid as a resource, but also on its inherent impact on the entire process chain. Therefore, this paper presents a method for decision support, considering technical boundary conditions and effects on the process chain layout as well as its application in a case study.

AB - Machining processes can be realized using different cutting fluid strategies–flood, dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). The choice of each strategy directly influences the need of peripheral units (e.g. filter units) and additional processes within the process chain (e.g. washing). Thus, selecting an energy and resource efficient cutting fluid strategy depends not only on cutting fluid as a resource, but also on its inherent impact on the entire process chain. Therefore, this paper presents a method for decision support, considering technical boundary conditions and effects on the process chain layout as well as its application in a case study.

KW - Cutting fluid

KW - Process chains

KW - Energy efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84939607849&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.056

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.056

M3 - Conference article

VL - 29

SP - 360

EP - 365

JO - Procedia CIRP

JF - Procedia CIRP

SN - 2212-8271

Y2 - 7 April 2015 through 9 April 2015

ER -

Energy efficient process chain: The impact of cutting fluid strategies

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this