Energy policy by beauty contests: the legitimacy of interactive sustainability policies at regional levels of the regulatory state

Maurits Sanders, Michiel A. Heldeweg, Elly G.P. Straatman, Johan F.D.B. Wempe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: To achieve the ambition of the energy transition in the built environment, Dutch local governments try to motivate citizens to participate as communities in policy processes. There is a general expectation that such an interactive approach will foster a more rational policy output and will create stronger support from citizens towards policy outcomes. The emphasis put on this output-outcome effectiveness should not eclipse another major criterion of government policy- and decision-making and implementation: the legitimacy of political authority. Major building blocks of such legitimacy are the principles of liberal democracy and of the rule of law. The aim of this contribution is to identify safeguards for a legitimate exercise of political authority in interactive regional governance initiatives.

Methods: The empirical data about ‘Sustainable Community Overijssel’ is gathered by document study, including research reports, policy plans, and project documents, and by studying recent publications and news items. The analysis uses Beetham’s multidimensional approach of legitimacy as point of departure.

Results: Beetham’s legitimacy dimensions are elaborated upon from a liberal democracy viewpoint and a regulatory state pragmatic choice between various institutional environments. From this, legitimacy dimensions of ‘shared values’ and ‘consent’ emerge as most sensitive to interactive policy-making, necessitating proper safeguards, safeguards with relevance to the legitimacy of initiatives such as Sustainable Community Overijssel.

Conclusions: Legitimacy is never a given standard, it may be designed into structures and ambitions, but it will still need to be achieved by proper practice. This is certainly the case in projects concerning sustainability challenges of which effective solutions are by no means clear and readily deployable. The Overijssel case should be seen as one of many interesting cases towards evidence-based effective and legitimate policy practices.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy, sustainability and society
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Energy policy
energy policy
beauty
Sustainable development
legitimacy
Decision making
sustainability
policy making
democracy
citizen
community
local government
decision making
policy
constitutional state
government policy
pragmatics
news
governance
energy

Keywords

  • METIS-302836
  • IR-89634

Cite this

@article{a902ff29cd27451ca7f5a83d56bdafcf,
title = "Energy policy by beauty contests: the legitimacy of interactive sustainability policies at regional levels of the regulatory state",
abstract = "Background: To achieve the ambition of the energy transition in the built environment, Dutch local governments try to motivate citizens to participate as communities in policy processes. There is a general expectation that such an interactive approach will foster a more rational policy output and will create stronger support from citizens towards policy outcomes. The emphasis put on this output-outcome effectiveness should not eclipse another major criterion of government policy- and decision-making and implementation: the legitimacy of political authority. Major building blocks of such legitimacy are the principles of liberal democracy and of the rule of law. The aim of this contribution is to identify safeguards for a legitimate exercise of political authority in interactive regional governance initiatives.Methods: The empirical data about ‘Sustainable Community Overijssel’ is gathered by document study, including research reports, policy plans, and project documents, and by studying recent publications and news items. The analysis uses Beetham’s multidimensional approach of legitimacy as point of departure.Results: Beetham’s legitimacy dimensions are elaborated upon from a liberal democracy viewpoint and a regulatory state pragmatic choice between various institutional environments. From this, legitimacy dimensions of ‘shared values’ and ‘consent’ emerge as most sensitive to interactive policy-making, necessitating proper safeguards, safeguards with relevance to the legitimacy of initiatives such as Sustainable Community Overijssel.Conclusions: Legitimacy is never a given standard, it may be designed into structures and ambitions, but it will still need to be achieved by proper practice. This is certainly the case in projects concerning sustainability challenges of which effective solutions are by no means clear and readily deployable. The Overijssel case should be seen as one of many interesting cases towards evidence-based effective and legitimate policy practices.",
keywords = "METIS-302836, IR-89634",
author = "Maurits Sanders and Heldeweg, {Michiel A.} and Straatman, {Elly G.P.} and Wempe, {Johan F.D.B.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1186/2192-0567-4-4",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Energy, sustainability and society",
issn = "2192-0567",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Energy policy by beauty contests : the legitimacy of interactive sustainability policies at regional levels of the regulatory state. / Sanders, Maurits; Heldeweg, Michiel A.; Straatman, Elly G.P.; Wempe, Johan F.D.B.

In: Energy, sustainability and society, Vol. 4, 4, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy policy by beauty contests

T2 - the legitimacy of interactive sustainability policies at regional levels of the regulatory state

AU - Sanders, Maurits

AU - Heldeweg, Michiel A.

AU - Straatman, Elly G.P.

AU - Wempe, Johan F.D.B.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: To achieve the ambition of the energy transition in the built environment, Dutch local governments try to motivate citizens to participate as communities in policy processes. There is a general expectation that such an interactive approach will foster a more rational policy output and will create stronger support from citizens towards policy outcomes. The emphasis put on this output-outcome effectiveness should not eclipse another major criterion of government policy- and decision-making and implementation: the legitimacy of political authority. Major building blocks of such legitimacy are the principles of liberal democracy and of the rule of law. The aim of this contribution is to identify safeguards for a legitimate exercise of political authority in interactive regional governance initiatives.Methods: The empirical data about ‘Sustainable Community Overijssel’ is gathered by document study, including research reports, policy plans, and project documents, and by studying recent publications and news items. The analysis uses Beetham’s multidimensional approach of legitimacy as point of departure.Results: Beetham’s legitimacy dimensions are elaborated upon from a liberal democracy viewpoint and a regulatory state pragmatic choice between various institutional environments. From this, legitimacy dimensions of ‘shared values’ and ‘consent’ emerge as most sensitive to interactive policy-making, necessitating proper safeguards, safeguards with relevance to the legitimacy of initiatives such as Sustainable Community Overijssel.Conclusions: Legitimacy is never a given standard, it may be designed into structures and ambitions, but it will still need to be achieved by proper practice. This is certainly the case in projects concerning sustainability challenges of which effective solutions are by no means clear and readily deployable. The Overijssel case should be seen as one of many interesting cases towards evidence-based effective and legitimate policy practices.

AB - Background: To achieve the ambition of the energy transition in the built environment, Dutch local governments try to motivate citizens to participate as communities in policy processes. There is a general expectation that such an interactive approach will foster a more rational policy output and will create stronger support from citizens towards policy outcomes. The emphasis put on this output-outcome effectiveness should not eclipse another major criterion of government policy- and decision-making and implementation: the legitimacy of political authority. Major building blocks of such legitimacy are the principles of liberal democracy and of the rule of law. The aim of this contribution is to identify safeguards for a legitimate exercise of political authority in interactive regional governance initiatives.Methods: The empirical data about ‘Sustainable Community Overijssel’ is gathered by document study, including research reports, policy plans, and project documents, and by studying recent publications and news items. The analysis uses Beetham’s multidimensional approach of legitimacy as point of departure.Results: Beetham’s legitimacy dimensions are elaborated upon from a liberal democracy viewpoint and a regulatory state pragmatic choice between various institutional environments. From this, legitimacy dimensions of ‘shared values’ and ‘consent’ emerge as most sensitive to interactive policy-making, necessitating proper safeguards, safeguards with relevance to the legitimacy of initiatives such as Sustainable Community Overijssel.Conclusions: Legitimacy is never a given standard, it may be designed into structures and ambitions, but it will still need to be achieved by proper practice. This is certainly the case in projects concerning sustainability challenges of which effective solutions are by no means clear and readily deployable. The Overijssel case should be seen as one of many interesting cases towards evidence-based effective and legitimate policy practices.

KW - METIS-302836

KW - IR-89634

U2 - 10.1186/2192-0567-4-4

DO - 10.1186/2192-0567-4-4

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Energy, sustainability and society

JF - Energy, sustainability and society

SN - 2192-0567

M1 - 4

ER -