Entrepreneurial cognition and the quality of new venture ideas: An experimental approach to comparing future-oriented cognitive processes

Arjan Frederiks (Corresponding Author), Basil G. Englis, Michel L. Ehrenhard, Arend J. Groen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    51 Citations (Scopus)
    11 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In the research reported here, we compared how future-oriented cognitive processes underpin differences in the quality of new venture ideas (NVIs) generated by respondents. We primed the use of future-oriented cognitive processes in two experiments. The first experiment shows that prospective thinking leads to NVIs of higher quality in comparison to counterfactual thinking, perspective taking and a control group. The second experiment shows that prospective thinking and perspective taking result in NVIs of higher quality compared to counterfactual thinking and the control group. We also find that prior knowledge of technology strengthens these effects. Post-hoc analyses show that these effects are present when respondents are prompted to generate NVIs, but not when they spontaneously generate NVIs, and that respondents with more prior business experience are more likely to spontaneously generate NVIs. Finally, we discuss contributions our research makes to the literature on entrepreneurial cognition and opportunity recognition, and to practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)327-347
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of business venturing
    Volume34
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

    Keywords

    • Future-oriented cognition
    • New venture idea
    • Experimental study
    • Prospective thinking
    • Counterfactual thinking
    • Perspective taking
    • 22/4 OA procedure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Entrepreneurial cognition and the quality of new venture ideas: An experimental approach to comparing future-oriented cognitive processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this