Environmental impact assessment of renewables and conventional fuels for different end use purposes

Canan Acar, Ibrahim Dincer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we present a comparative environmental impact assessment of renewables and conventional fossil fuels for electricity and hydrogen generation. The conventional fossil fuels investigated in this study are coal, oil, and natural gas. Renewables considered in this study are geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar, and wind energies. Furthermore, nuclear and biomass energies are taken into consideration while assessing environmental impact and performances. Environmental impact criteria considered in this study are CO2, NOx, and SO2 emissions, land use, water consumption, water quality of discharge, solid waste and ground contamination, and biodiversity. For comparison purposes, all collected data are normalised and ranked between 0 and 3 while 0 giving highest negative environmental impact and 3 giving lowest negative environmental impact. Our results showed that overall, in terms of both electricity and hydrogen production, oceans give the highest rankings (2.71 for electricity and 2.73 for hydrogen). Coal has the lowest rankings in terms of environmental impact (0.26 for electricity and 0.30 for hydrogen).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-277
JournalInternational Journal of Global Warming
Volume13
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Global warming
  • Emissions
  • Energy
  • Exergy
  • Electricity
  • Hydrogen
  • Renewables

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental impact assessment of renewables and conventional fuels for different end use purposes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this