Equimoves: A wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait

Stephan Bosch (Corresponding Author), Filipe Serra Bragança, Mihai Marin-Perianu, Raluca Marin-Perianu, Berend Jan van der Zwaag, John Voskamp, Willem Back, René Van Weeren, Paul Havinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland-Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ±2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of -8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number850
JournalSensors (Switserland)
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

gait
horses
Gait
Horses
Kinematics
examination
Biomechanical Phenomena
Articular Range of Motion
Depth perception
Units of measurement
kinematics
Depth Perception
Optical systems
Sacrum
Optical Devices
Veterinarians
Upper Extremity
space perception
symmetry
limbs

Keywords

  • Gait analysis
  • Horse
  • IMU
  • Lameness
  • Optical motion capture
  • Agreement analysis

Cite this

Bosch, Stephan ; Serra Bragança, Filipe ; Marin-Perianu, Mihai ; Marin-Perianu, Raluca ; van der Zwaag, Berend Jan ; Voskamp, John ; Back, Willem ; Van Weeren, René ; Havinga, Paul. / Equimoves: A wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait. In: Sensors (Switserland). 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 3.
@article{94bf4ade60ee4d7d88e130d8e60a9269,
title = "Equimoves: A wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait",
abstract = "In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland-Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ±2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of -8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.",
keywords = "Gait analysis, Horse, IMU, Lameness, Optical motion capture, Agreement analysis",
author = "Stephan Bosch and {Serra Bragan{\cc}a}, Filipe and Mihai Marin-Perianu and Raluca Marin-Perianu and {van der Zwaag}, {Berend Jan} and John Voskamp and Willem Back and {Van Weeren}, Ren{\'e} and Paul Havinga",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3390/s18030850",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Sensors (Switserland)",
issn = "1424-8220",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute",
number = "3",

}

Equimoves: A wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait. / Bosch, Stephan (Corresponding Author); Serra Bragança, Filipe; Marin-Perianu, Mihai; Marin-Perianu, Raluca; van der Zwaag, Berend Jan; Voskamp, John; Back, Willem; Van Weeren, René; Havinga, Paul.

In: Sensors (Switserland), Vol. 18, No. 3, 850, 13.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equimoves: A wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait

AU - Bosch, Stephan

AU - Serra Bragança, Filipe

AU - Marin-Perianu, Mihai

AU - Marin-Perianu, Raluca

AU - van der Zwaag, Berend Jan

AU - Voskamp, John

AU - Back, Willem

AU - Van Weeren, René

AU - Havinga, Paul

PY - 2018/3/13

Y1 - 2018/3/13

N2 - In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland-Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ±2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of -8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.

AB - In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland-Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ±2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of -8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.

KW - Gait analysis

KW - Horse

KW - IMU

KW - Lameness

KW - Optical motion capture

KW - Agreement analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044085735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/s18030850

DO - 10.3390/s18030850

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Sensors (Switserland)

JF - Sensors (Switserland)

SN - 1424-8220

IS - 3

M1 - 850

ER -