Abstract
Several techniques exist to incorporate disturbance rejection requirements in a linear controller design. Contrary to, for example the H-infinity controller design technique where only one degree of freedom is available to obtain both disturbance rejection and performance, a disturbance observer adds a degree of freedom, thereby enabling a separate design of the disturbance rejection and the performance. There are many ways to design, implement and represent disturbance observers. We focus on two design methodologies and their corresponding representations. It can be shown that, in the case that the (SISO) plant is linear, the methodologies result in an equivalent disturbance observer. We use this equivalence to relate some properties well-known for one methodology to the other methodology, and vice versa
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 39th Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE 2000 |
Place of Publication | Los Alamitos, CA |
Publisher | IEEE |
Pages | 4518-4519 |
Volume | 5 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780780366381 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 Jan 2000 |
Event | 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2000 - Sydney Convention and Exhibition Centre , Sydney, Australia Duration: 12 Dec 2000 → 15 Dec 2000 Conference number: 39 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings IEEE Conference on Decision and Control |
---|---|
Publisher | IEEE |
Number | 39 |
Volume | 2002 |
ISSN (Print) | 0191-2216 |
Conference
Conference | 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2000 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | CDC |
Country/Territory | Australia |
City | Sydney |
Period | 12/12/00 → 15/12/00 |
Keywords
- n/a OA procedure