TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating Optimal Weights for Compound Scores
T2 - A Multidimensional IRT Approach
AU - van Lier, Hendrika G.
AU - Siemons, Liseth
AU - van der Laar, Mart A.F.J.
AU - Glas, Cees A.W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was not supported by a grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/11/2
Y1 - 2018/11/2
N2 - A method is proposed for constructing indices as linear functions of variables such that the reliability of the compound score is maximized. Reliability is defined in the framework of latent variable modeling [i.e., item response theory (IRT)] and optimal weights of the components of the index are found by maximizing the posterior variance relative to the total latent variable variance. Three methods for estimating the weights are proposed. The first is a likelihood-based approach, that is, marginal maximum likelihood (MML). The other two are Bayesian approaches based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) computational methods. One is based on an augmented Gibbs sampler specifically targeted at IRT, and the other is based on a general purpose Gibbs sampler such as implemented in OpenBugs and Jags. Simulation studies are presented to demonstrate the procedure and to compare the three methods. Results are very similar, so practitioners may be suggested the use of the easily accessible latter method. A real-data set pertaining to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score is used to show how the methods can be applied in a complex measurement situation with multiple time points and mixed data formats.
AB - A method is proposed for constructing indices as linear functions of variables such that the reliability of the compound score is maximized. Reliability is defined in the framework of latent variable modeling [i.e., item response theory (IRT)] and optimal weights of the components of the index are found by maximizing the posterior variance relative to the total latent variable variance. Three methods for estimating the weights are proposed. The first is a likelihood-based approach, that is, marginal maximum likelihood (MML). The other two are Bayesian approaches based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) computational methods. One is based on an augmented Gibbs sampler specifically targeted at IRT, and the other is based on a general purpose Gibbs sampler such as implemented in OpenBugs and Jags. Simulation studies are presented to demonstrate the procedure and to compare the three methods. Results are very similar, so practitioners may be suggested the use of the easily accessible latter method. A real-data set pertaining to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score is used to show how the methods can be applied in a complex measurement situation with multiple time points and mixed data formats.
KW - Bayesian estimation
KW - full-information factor analysis
KW - item response theory
KW - marginal maximum likelihood
KW - multidimensional item response theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057314080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00273171.2018.1478712
DO - 10.1080/00273171.2018.1478712
M3 - Article
C2 - 30463444
AN - SCOPUS:85057314080
SN - 0027-3171
VL - 53
SP - 914
EP - 924
JO - Multivariate behavioral research
JF - Multivariate behavioral research
IS - 6
ER -