TY - JOUR
T1 - EULAR/eumusc.net standards of care for rheumatoid arthritis
T2 - cross-sectional analyses of importance, level of implementation and care gaps experienced by patients and rheumatologists across 35 European countries
AU - Meisters, Rachelle
AU - Putrik, Polina
AU - Ramiro, Sofia
AU - Hifinger, Monika
AU - Keszei, Andras P.
AU - Van Eijk-Hustings, Yvonne
AU - Woolf, Anthony D.
AU - Smolen, Josef S.
AU - Stamm, Tanja A.
AU - Stoffer-Marx, Michaela
AU - Uhlig, Till
AU - Moe, Rikke Helene
AU - De Wit, Maarten
AU - Tafaj, Argjend
AU - Mukuchyan, Vahan
AU - Studenic, Paul
AU - Verschueren, Patrick
AU - Shumnalieva, Russka
AU - Charalambous, Paraskevi
AU - Vencovský, Jirí
AU - Varvouni, Melpomeni
AU - Kull, Mart
AU - Puolakka, Kari
AU - Gossec, Laure
AU - Gobejishvili, Nino
AU - Detert, Jacqueline
AU - Sidiropoulos, Prodromos
AU - Péntek, Márta
AU - Kane, David
AU - Scirè, Carlo Alberto
AU - Arad, Uri
AU - Andersone, Daina
AU - Van De Laar, Mart
AU - Van Der Helm-Van Mil, Annette
AU - Głuszko, Piotr
AU - Cunha-Miranda, Luís
AU - Berghea, Florian
AU - Damjanov, Nemanja S.
AU - Tomšič, Matija
AU - Carmona, Loreto
AU - Turesson, Carl
AU - Ciurea, Adrian
AU - Shukurova, Surayo
AU - Inanc, Nevsun
AU - Verstappen, Suzanne M.M.
AU - Boonen, Annelies
PY - 2020/10/12
Y1 - 2020/10/12
N2 - Objective As part of European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)/European Musculoskeletal Conditions Surveillance and Information Network, 20 user-focused standards of care (SoCs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) addressing 16 domains of care were developed. This study aimed to explore gaps in implementation of these SoCs across Europe. Methods Two cross-sectional surveys on the importance, level of and barriers (patients only) to implementation of each SoC (0-10, 10 highest) were designed to be conducted among patients and rheumatologists in 50 European countries. Care gaps were calculated as the difference between the actual and maximum possible score for implementation (ie, 10) multiplied by the care importance score, resulting in care gaps (0-100, maximal gap). Factors associated with the problematic care gaps (ie, gap≥30 and importance≥6 and implementation<6) and strong barriers (≥6) were further analysed in multilevel logistic regression models. Results Overall, 26 and 31 countries provided data from 1873 patients and 1131 rheumatologists, respectively. 19 out of 20 SoCs were problematic from the perspectives of more than 20% of patients, while this was true for only 10 SoCs for rheumatologists. Rheumatologists in countries with lower gross domestic product and non-European Union countries were more likely to report problematic gaps in 15 of 20 SoCs, while virtually no differences were observed among patients. Lack of relevance of some SoCs (71%) and limited time of professionals (66%) were the most frequent implementation barriers identified by patients. Conclusions Many problematic gaps were reported across several essential aspects of RA care. More efforts need to be devoted to implementation of EULAR SoCs.
AB - Objective As part of European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)/European Musculoskeletal Conditions Surveillance and Information Network, 20 user-focused standards of care (SoCs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) addressing 16 domains of care were developed. This study aimed to explore gaps in implementation of these SoCs across Europe. Methods Two cross-sectional surveys on the importance, level of and barriers (patients only) to implementation of each SoC (0-10, 10 highest) were designed to be conducted among patients and rheumatologists in 50 European countries. Care gaps were calculated as the difference between the actual and maximum possible score for implementation (ie, 10) multiplied by the care importance score, resulting in care gaps (0-100, maximal gap). Factors associated with the problematic care gaps (ie, gap≥30 and importance≥6 and implementation<6) and strong barriers (≥6) were further analysed in multilevel logistic regression models. Results Overall, 26 and 31 countries provided data from 1873 patients and 1131 rheumatologists, respectively. 19 out of 20 SoCs were problematic from the perspectives of more than 20% of patients, while this was true for only 10 SoCs for rheumatologists. Rheumatologists in countries with lower gross domestic product and non-European Union countries were more likely to report problematic gaps in 15 of 20 SoCs, while virtually no differences were observed among patients. Lack of relevance of some SoCs (71%) and limited time of professionals (66%) were the most frequent implementation barriers identified by patients. Conclusions Many problematic gaps were reported across several essential aspects of RA care. More efforts need to be devoted to implementation of EULAR SoCs.
KW - arthritis
KW - health care
KW - health services research
KW - outcome and process assessment
KW - rheumatoid
KW - n/a OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092944463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217520
DO - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217520
M3 - Article
C2 - 32873554
AN - SCOPUS:85092944463
SN - 0003-4967
VL - 79
SP - 1423
EP - 1431
JO - Annals of the rheumatic diseases
JF - Annals of the rheumatic diseases
IS - 11
ER -