Abstract
Purpose: Recent developments in iterative image reconstruction enable absolute quantification of SPECT/CT studies by incorporating compensation for collimator-detector response, attenuation, and scatter as well as resolution recovery into the reconstruction process (Evolution; Q.Metrix package; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The aim of this experimental study is to assess its quantitative accuracy for potential clinical 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI)-related SPECT/CT application in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response studies in breast cancer. Methods: Two phantoms were filled with MIBI and acquired on a SPECT/CT gamma camera (Discovery 670 Pro; GE Healthcare), that is, a water cylinder and a NEMA body phantom containing six spheres that were filled with an activity concentration reflecting clinical MIBI uptake. Subsequently, volumes-of-interest (VOI) of each sphere were drawn (semi)automatically on SPECT using various isocontour methods or manually on CT. Finally, prone MIBI SPECT/CT scans were acquired 5 and 90 min p.i. in a locally advanced breast cancer patient. Results: Activity concentration in the four largest spheres converged after nine iterations of evolution. Depending on the count statistics, the accuracy of the reconstructed activity concentration varied between -4.7 and -0.16% (VOI covering the entire phantom) and from 6.9% to 10% (8.8 cm Ø cylinder VOI placed in the center of the phantom). Recovery coefficients of SUVmax were 1.89 ± 0.18, 1.76 ± 0.17, 2.00 ± 0.38, 1.89 ± 0.35, and 0.90 ± 0.26 for spheres with 37, 28, 22, 17, and 13 mm Ø, respectively. Recovery coefficients of SUVmean were 1.07 ± 0.06, 1.03 ± 0.09, 1.17 ± 0.21, 1.10 ± 0.20, and 0.52 ± 0.14 (42% isocontour); 1.10 ± 0.07, 1.02 ± 0.09, 1.13 ± 0.19, 1.06 ± 0.19, and 0.51 ± 0.13 (36% isocontour with local background correction); and 0.96, 1.09, 1.03, 1.03, and 0.29 (CT). Patient study results were concordant with the phantom validation. Conclusions: Absolute SPECT/CT quantification of breast studies using MIBI seems feasible (<17% deviation) when a 42% isocontour is used for delineation for tumors of at least 17 mm diameter. However, with tumor shrinkage, response evaluation should be handled with caution, especially when using SUVmax.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2143-2153 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Medical physics |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- UT-Hybrid-D
- Breast cancer
- Resolution modeling
- SPECT/CT
- SUV
- Absolute quantification
Cite this
}
Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer. / Collarino, Angela; Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M.; Valdés Olmos, Renato A.; van der Tol, Pieternel; Dibbets-Schneider, Petra; de Geus-Oei, Lioe Fee; van Velden, Floris H.P. (Corresponding Author).
In: Medical physics, Vol. 45, No. 5, 05.2018, p. 2143-2153.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer
AU - Collarino, Angela
AU - Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M.
AU - Valdés Olmos, Renato A.
AU - van der Tol, Pieternel
AU - Dibbets-Schneider, Petra
AU - de Geus-Oei, Lioe Fee
AU - van Velden, Floris H.P.
N1 - Wiley deal
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Purpose: Recent developments in iterative image reconstruction enable absolute quantification of SPECT/CT studies by incorporating compensation for collimator-detector response, attenuation, and scatter as well as resolution recovery into the reconstruction process (Evolution; Q.Metrix package; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The aim of this experimental study is to assess its quantitative accuracy for potential clinical 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI)-related SPECT/CT application in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response studies in breast cancer. Methods: Two phantoms were filled with MIBI and acquired on a SPECT/CT gamma camera (Discovery 670 Pro; GE Healthcare), that is, a water cylinder and a NEMA body phantom containing six spheres that were filled with an activity concentration reflecting clinical MIBI uptake. Subsequently, volumes-of-interest (VOI) of each sphere were drawn (semi)automatically on SPECT using various isocontour methods or manually on CT. Finally, prone MIBI SPECT/CT scans were acquired 5 and 90 min p.i. in a locally advanced breast cancer patient. Results: Activity concentration in the four largest spheres converged after nine iterations of evolution. Depending on the count statistics, the accuracy of the reconstructed activity concentration varied between -4.7 and -0.16% (VOI covering the entire phantom) and from 6.9% to 10% (8.8 cm Ø cylinder VOI placed in the center of the phantom). Recovery coefficients of SUVmax were 1.89 ± 0.18, 1.76 ± 0.17, 2.00 ± 0.38, 1.89 ± 0.35, and 0.90 ± 0.26 for spheres with 37, 28, 22, 17, and 13 mm Ø, respectively. Recovery coefficients of SUVmean were 1.07 ± 0.06, 1.03 ± 0.09, 1.17 ± 0.21, 1.10 ± 0.20, and 0.52 ± 0.14 (42% isocontour); 1.10 ± 0.07, 1.02 ± 0.09, 1.13 ± 0.19, 1.06 ± 0.19, and 0.51 ± 0.13 (36% isocontour with local background correction); and 0.96, 1.09, 1.03, 1.03, and 0.29 (CT). Patient study results were concordant with the phantom validation. Conclusions: Absolute SPECT/CT quantification of breast studies using MIBI seems feasible (<17% deviation) when a 42% isocontour is used for delineation for tumors of at least 17 mm diameter. However, with tumor shrinkage, response evaluation should be handled with caution, especially when using SUVmax.
AB - Purpose: Recent developments in iterative image reconstruction enable absolute quantification of SPECT/CT studies by incorporating compensation for collimator-detector response, attenuation, and scatter as well as resolution recovery into the reconstruction process (Evolution; Q.Metrix package; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The aim of this experimental study is to assess its quantitative accuracy for potential clinical 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI)-related SPECT/CT application in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response studies in breast cancer. Methods: Two phantoms were filled with MIBI and acquired on a SPECT/CT gamma camera (Discovery 670 Pro; GE Healthcare), that is, a water cylinder and a NEMA body phantom containing six spheres that were filled with an activity concentration reflecting clinical MIBI uptake. Subsequently, volumes-of-interest (VOI) of each sphere were drawn (semi)automatically on SPECT using various isocontour methods or manually on CT. Finally, prone MIBI SPECT/CT scans were acquired 5 and 90 min p.i. in a locally advanced breast cancer patient. Results: Activity concentration in the four largest spheres converged after nine iterations of evolution. Depending on the count statistics, the accuracy of the reconstructed activity concentration varied between -4.7 and -0.16% (VOI covering the entire phantom) and from 6.9% to 10% (8.8 cm Ø cylinder VOI placed in the center of the phantom). Recovery coefficients of SUVmax were 1.89 ± 0.18, 1.76 ± 0.17, 2.00 ± 0.38, 1.89 ± 0.35, and 0.90 ± 0.26 for spheres with 37, 28, 22, 17, and 13 mm Ø, respectively. Recovery coefficients of SUVmean were 1.07 ± 0.06, 1.03 ± 0.09, 1.17 ± 0.21, 1.10 ± 0.20, and 0.52 ± 0.14 (42% isocontour); 1.10 ± 0.07, 1.02 ± 0.09, 1.13 ± 0.19, 1.06 ± 0.19, and 0.51 ± 0.13 (36% isocontour with local background correction); and 0.96, 1.09, 1.03, 1.03, and 0.29 (CT). Patient study results were concordant with the phantom validation. Conclusions: Absolute SPECT/CT quantification of breast studies using MIBI seems feasible (<17% deviation) when a 42% isocontour is used for delineation for tumors of at least 17 mm diameter. However, with tumor shrinkage, response evaluation should be handled with caution, especially when using SUVmax.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Resolution modeling
KW - SPECT/CT
KW - SUV
KW - Absolute quantification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045037554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mp.12880
DO - 10.1002/mp.12880
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045037554
VL - 45
SP - 2143
EP - 2153
JO - Medical physics
JF - Medical physics
SN - 0094-2405
IS - 5
ER -