Explaining variability in therapist adherence and patient depressive symptom improvement: The role of therapist interpersonal skills and patient engagement

Evelien Snippe (Corresponding Author), Maya J. Schroevers, K. Annika Tovote, Robbert Sanderman, Paul M.G. Emmelkamp, Joke Fleer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Understanding why therapists deviate from a treatment manual is crucial to interpret the mixed findings on the adherence–outcome association. The current study aims to examine whether therapists' interpersonal behaviours and patients' active engagement predict treatment outcome and therapist adherence in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for depressive symptoms. In addition, the study explores rater's explanations for therapist nonadherence at sessions in which therapist adherence was low. Study participants were 61 patients with diabetes and depressive symptoms who were randomized to either CBT or MBCT. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Therapist adherence, therapist interpersonal skills (i.e., empathy, warmth, and involvement), patients' active engagement, and reasons for nonadherence were assessed by two independent raters (based on digital video recordings). Therapist adherence, therapists' interpersonal skills, and patients' active engagement did not predict posttreatment depressive symptom reduction. Patients' active engagement was positively associated with therapist adherence in CBT and in MBCT. This indicates that adherence may be hampered when patients are not actively engaged in treatment. Observed reasons for nonadherence mostly covered responses to patient's in-session behaviour. The variety of reasons for therapist nonadherence might explain why therapist adherence was not associated with outcomes of CBT and MBCT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-93
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
Volume26
Issue number1
Early online date10 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Cognitive Therapy
Patient Compliance
Depression
Mindfulness
Video Recording
Social Skills
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • interpersonal skills
  • patient involvement
  • randomized controlled trial
  • treatment integrity
  • depression

Cite this

Snippe, Evelien ; Schroevers, Maya J. ; Tovote, K. Annika ; Sanderman, Robbert ; Emmelkamp, Paul M.G. ; Fleer, Joke. / Explaining variability in therapist adherence and patient depressive symptom improvement : The role of therapist interpersonal skills and patient engagement. In: Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 84-93.
@article{a84dfc1545a34994b757393d4a4f5430,
title = "Explaining variability in therapist adherence and patient depressive symptom improvement: The role of therapist interpersonal skills and patient engagement",
abstract = "Understanding why therapists deviate from a treatment manual is crucial to interpret the mixed findings on the adherence–outcome association. The current study aims to examine whether therapists' interpersonal behaviours and patients' active engagement predict treatment outcome and therapist adherence in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for depressive symptoms. In addition, the study explores rater's explanations for therapist nonadherence at sessions in which therapist adherence was low. Study participants were 61 patients with diabetes and depressive symptoms who were randomized to either CBT or MBCT. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Therapist adherence, therapist interpersonal skills (i.e., empathy, warmth, and involvement), patients' active engagement, and reasons for nonadherence were assessed by two independent raters (based on digital video recordings). Therapist adherence, therapists' interpersonal skills, and patients' active engagement did not predict posttreatment depressive symptom reduction. Patients' active engagement was positively associated with therapist adherence in CBT and in MBCT. This indicates that adherence may be hampered when patients are not actively engaged in treatment. Observed reasons for nonadherence mostly covered responses to patient's in-session behaviour. The variety of reasons for therapist nonadherence might explain why therapist adherence was not associated with outcomes of CBT and MBCT.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, interpersonal skills, patient involvement, randomized controlled trial, treatment integrity, depression",
author = "Evelien Snippe and Schroevers, {Maya J.} and Tovote, {K. Annika} and Robbert Sanderman and Emmelkamp, {Paul M.G.} and Joke Fleer",
note = "Wiley deal",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/cpp.2332",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Clinical psychology & psychotherapy",
issn = "1063-3995",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Explaining variability in therapist adherence and patient depressive symptom improvement : The role of therapist interpersonal skills and patient engagement. / Snippe, Evelien (Corresponding Author); Schroevers, Maya J.; Tovote, K. Annika; Sanderman, Robbert; Emmelkamp, Paul M.G.; Fleer, Joke.

In: Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 30.01.2019, p. 84-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining variability in therapist adherence and patient depressive symptom improvement

T2 - The role of therapist interpersonal skills and patient engagement

AU - Snippe, Evelien

AU - Schroevers, Maya J.

AU - Tovote, K. Annika

AU - Sanderman, Robbert

AU - Emmelkamp, Paul M.G.

AU - Fleer, Joke

N1 - Wiley deal

PY - 2019/1/30

Y1 - 2019/1/30

N2 - Understanding why therapists deviate from a treatment manual is crucial to interpret the mixed findings on the adherence–outcome association. The current study aims to examine whether therapists' interpersonal behaviours and patients' active engagement predict treatment outcome and therapist adherence in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for depressive symptoms. In addition, the study explores rater's explanations for therapist nonadherence at sessions in which therapist adherence was low. Study participants were 61 patients with diabetes and depressive symptoms who were randomized to either CBT or MBCT. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Therapist adherence, therapist interpersonal skills (i.e., empathy, warmth, and involvement), patients' active engagement, and reasons for nonadherence were assessed by two independent raters (based on digital video recordings). Therapist adherence, therapists' interpersonal skills, and patients' active engagement did not predict posttreatment depressive symptom reduction. Patients' active engagement was positively associated with therapist adherence in CBT and in MBCT. This indicates that adherence may be hampered when patients are not actively engaged in treatment. Observed reasons for nonadherence mostly covered responses to patient's in-session behaviour. The variety of reasons for therapist nonadherence might explain why therapist adherence was not associated with outcomes of CBT and MBCT.

AB - Understanding why therapists deviate from a treatment manual is crucial to interpret the mixed findings on the adherence–outcome association. The current study aims to examine whether therapists' interpersonal behaviours and patients' active engagement predict treatment outcome and therapist adherence in cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for depressive symptoms. In addition, the study explores rater's explanations for therapist nonadherence at sessions in which therapist adherence was low. Study participants were 61 patients with diabetes and depressive symptoms who were randomized to either CBT or MBCT. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Therapist adherence, therapist interpersonal skills (i.e., empathy, warmth, and involvement), patients' active engagement, and reasons for nonadherence were assessed by two independent raters (based on digital video recordings). Therapist adherence, therapists' interpersonal skills, and patients' active engagement did not predict posttreatment depressive symptom reduction. Patients' active engagement was positively associated with therapist adherence in CBT and in MBCT. This indicates that adherence may be hampered when patients are not actively engaged in treatment. Observed reasons for nonadherence mostly covered responses to patient's in-session behaviour. The variety of reasons for therapist nonadherence might explain why therapist adherence was not associated with outcomes of CBT and MBCT.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - interpersonal skills

KW - patient involvement

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - treatment integrity

KW - depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053878070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cpp.2332

DO - 10.1002/cpp.2332

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Clinical psychology & psychotherapy

JF - Clinical psychology & psychotherapy

SN - 1063-3995

IS - 1

ER -