TY - BOOK
T1 - Exploring new methods to detect person misfit in CAT
AU - Meijer, R.R.
AU - van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - Item scores that do not fit an assumed item response theory model may cause the latent trait value to be inaccurately estimated. Several person-fit statistics for detecting nonfitting response behavior for paper-and-pencil tests have been proposed. In the context of computerized adaptive testing, the use of person-fit analysis is hardly explored. Because it has been shown that the distribution of existing person-fit statistics is not applicable in a computer adaptive test (CAT), new person-fit statistics are proposed, and critical values for these statistics are derived from existing statistical theory. The theoretical and empirical distributions are compared, and a power study is performed.
AB - Item scores that do not fit an assumed item response theory model may cause the latent trait value to be inaccurately estimated. Several person-fit statistics for detecting nonfitting response behavior for paper-and-pencil tests have been proposed. In the context of computerized adaptive testing, the use of person-fit analysis is hardly explored. Because it has been shown that the distribution of existing person-fit statistics is not applicable in a computer adaptive test (CAT), new person-fit statistics are proposed, and critical values for these statistics are derived from existing statistical theory. The theoretical and empirical distributions are compared, and a power study is performed.
KW - IR-104263
M3 - Report
T3 - LSAC research report series
BT - Exploring new methods to detect person misfit in CAT
PB - Law School Admission Council
CY - Newton, PA, USA
ER -