External efficacy and perceived responsiveness - Similar but distinct concepts

Peter Esaiasson, Ann-Kristin Kölln, Sedef Turper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Representation theory obliges representatives to be responsive toward citizens’ wishes and demands between elections. Responsiveness is crucial because it provides citizens with a mechanism to control representatives beyond Election Day (Dahl, 1971; Mansbridge, 2003; Pitkin, 1967; Powell, 2004). This article addresses the subjective side of responsiveness processes: the extent to which citizens believe that representatives are indeed sensitive to their wishes and demands. Focusing on both conceptualization and measurement, we examine how survey researchers study responsiveness beliefs. Are current practices adequate, or is there room for improvement?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-445
JournalInternational journal of public opinion research
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

citizen
election

Keywords

  • METIS-311841
  • IR-97292

Cite this

Esaiasson, Peter ; Kölln, Ann-Kristin ; Turper, Sedef. / External efficacy and perceived responsiveness - Similar but distinct concepts. In: International journal of public opinion research. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 432-445.
@article{c4434ddfa2434226ad5e18823d684134,
title = "External efficacy and perceived responsiveness - Similar but distinct concepts",
abstract = "Representation theory obliges representatives to be responsive toward citizens’ wishes and demands between elections. Responsiveness is crucial because it provides citizens with a mechanism to control representatives beyond Election Day (Dahl, 1971; Mansbridge, 2003; Pitkin, 1967; Powell, 2004). This article addresses the subjective side of responsiveness processes: the extent to which citizens believe that representatives are indeed sensitive to their wishes and demands. Focusing on both conceptualization and measurement, we examine how survey researchers study responsiveness beliefs. Are current practices adequate, or is there room for improvement?",
keywords = "METIS-311841, IR-97292",
author = "Peter Esaiasson and Ann-Kristin K{\"o}lln and Sedef Turper",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/ijpor/edv003",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "432--445",
journal = "International journal of public opinion research",
issn = "0954-2892",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

External efficacy and perceived responsiveness - Similar but distinct concepts. / Esaiasson, Peter; Kölln, Ann-Kristin; Turper, Sedef.

In: International journal of public opinion research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2015, p. 432-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - External efficacy and perceived responsiveness - Similar but distinct concepts

AU - Esaiasson, Peter

AU - Kölln, Ann-Kristin

AU - Turper, Sedef

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Representation theory obliges representatives to be responsive toward citizens’ wishes and demands between elections. Responsiveness is crucial because it provides citizens with a mechanism to control representatives beyond Election Day (Dahl, 1971; Mansbridge, 2003; Pitkin, 1967; Powell, 2004). This article addresses the subjective side of responsiveness processes: the extent to which citizens believe that representatives are indeed sensitive to their wishes and demands. Focusing on both conceptualization and measurement, we examine how survey researchers study responsiveness beliefs. Are current practices adequate, or is there room for improvement?

AB - Representation theory obliges representatives to be responsive toward citizens’ wishes and demands between elections. Responsiveness is crucial because it provides citizens with a mechanism to control representatives beyond Election Day (Dahl, 1971; Mansbridge, 2003; Pitkin, 1967; Powell, 2004). This article addresses the subjective side of responsiveness processes: the extent to which citizens believe that representatives are indeed sensitive to their wishes and demands. Focusing on both conceptualization and measurement, we examine how survey researchers study responsiveness beliefs. Are current practices adequate, or is there room for improvement?

KW - METIS-311841

KW - IR-97292

U2 - 10.1093/ijpor/edv003

DO - 10.1093/ijpor/edv003

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 432

EP - 445

JO - International journal of public opinion research

JF - International journal of public opinion research

SN - 0954-2892

IS - 3

ER -