TY - JOUR
T1 - Fair street space allocation
T2 - ethical principles and empirical insights
AU - Creutzig, Felix
AU - Javaid, Aneeque
AU - Soomauroo, Zakia
AU - Lohrey, Steffen
AU - Milojevic-Dupont, Nikola
AU - Ramakrishnan, Anjali
AU - Sethi, Mahendra
AU - Liu, Lijing
AU - Niamir, Leila
AU - Bren d’Amour, Christopher
AU - Weddige, Ulf
AU - Lenzi, Dominic
AU - Kowarsch, Martin
AU - Arndt, Luisa
AU - Baumann, Lulzim
AU - Betzien, Jody
AU - Fonkwa, Lesly
AU - Huber, Bettina
AU - Mendez, Ernesto
AU - Misiou, Alexandra
AU - Pearce, Cameron
AU - Radman, Paula
AU - Skaloud, Paul
AU - Zausch, J. Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Urban street space is increasingly contested. However, it is unclear what a fair street space allocation would look like. We develop a framework of ten ethical principles and three normative perspectives on street space–streets for transport, streets for sustainability, and streets as place–and discuss 14 derived street space allocation mechanisms. We contrast these ethically grounded allocation mechanisms with real-world allocation in 18 streets in Berlin. We find that car users, on average, had 3.5 times more space available than non-car users. While some allocation mechanisms are more plausible than others, none is without disputed normative implications. All of the ethical principles, however, suggest that on-street parking for cars is difficult to justify, and that cycling deserves more space. We argue that ethical principles should be systematically integrated into urban and transport planning.
AB - Urban street space is increasingly contested. However, it is unclear what a fair street space allocation would look like. We develop a framework of ten ethical principles and three normative perspectives on street space–streets for transport, streets for sustainability, and streets as place–and discuss 14 derived street space allocation mechanisms. We contrast these ethically grounded allocation mechanisms with real-world allocation in 18 streets in Berlin. We find that car users, on average, had 3.5 times more space available than non-car users. While some allocation mechanisms are more plausible than others, none is without disputed normative implications. All of the ethical principles, however, suggest that on-street parking for cars is difficult to justify, and that cycling deserves more space. We argue that ethical principles should be systematically integrated into urban and transport planning.
KW - Cycling
KW - Ethical principles
KW - Governance
KW - Parking
KW - Urban transport
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085470516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795
DO - 10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795
M3 - Article
SN - 0144-1647
VL - 40
SP - 711
EP - 733
JO - Transport reviews
JF - Transport reviews
IS - 6
ER -