Abstract
The debate in New Zealand over whether to adopt a mixed-member proportional (MMP) system was based on a number of predictions about the effects of electoral systems. After four elections under MMP we are now in a better position to evaluate the validity of these claims. We find that both proponents and opponents made claims that proved to be true but there were also unforeseen consequences that neither side predicted.
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 267-284 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Acta politica |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Keywords
- electoral reform
- Legitimacy
- Accountability
- mixed-member proportional systems
- responsiveness
- IR-61164
- METIS-232733