TY - JOUR
T1 - Forensic gait analysis — Morphometric assessment from surveillance footage
AU - Seckiner, Dilan
AU - Mallett, Xanthé
AU - Maynard, Philip
AU - Meuwly, Didier
AU - Roux, Claude
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Following the technological rise of surveillance cameras and their subsequent proliferation in public places, the use of information gathered by such means for investigative and evaluative purposes sparked a large interest in the forensic community and within policing scenarios. In particular, it is suggested that analysis of the body, especially the assessment of gait characteristics, can provide useful information to aid the investigation. This paper discusses the influences upon gait to mitigate some of the limitations of surveillance footage, including those due to the varying anatomical differences between individuals. Furthermore, the differences between various techniques applied to assess gait are discussed, including biometric gait recognition, forensic gait analysis, tracking technology, and marker technology. This review article discusses the limitations of the current methods for assessment of gait; exposing gaps within the literature in regard to various influences impacting upon the gait cycle. Furthermore, it suggests a ‘morphometric’ technique to enhance the available procedures to potentially facilitate the development of standardised protocols with supporting statistics and database. This in turn will provide meaningful information to forensic investigation, intelligence-gathering processes, and potentially as an additional method of forensic evaluation of evidence.
AB - Following the technological rise of surveillance cameras and their subsequent proliferation in public places, the use of information gathered by such means for investigative and evaluative purposes sparked a large interest in the forensic community and within policing scenarios. In particular, it is suggested that analysis of the body, especially the assessment of gait characteristics, can provide useful information to aid the investigation. This paper discusses the influences upon gait to mitigate some of the limitations of surveillance footage, including those due to the varying anatomical differences between individuals. Furthermore, the differences between various techniques applied to assess gait are discussed, including biometric gait recognition, forensic gait analysis, tracking technology, and marker technology. This review article discusses the limitations of the current methods for assessment of gait; exposing gaps within the literature in regard to various influences impacting upon the gait cycle. Furthermore, it suggests a ‘morphometric’ technique to enhance the available procedures to potentially facilitate the development of standardised protocols with supporting statistics and database. This in turn will provide meaningful information to forensic investigation, intelligence-gathering processes, and potentially as an additional method of forensic evaluation of evidence.
KW - Gait analysis
KW - Morphometric assessment
KW - Surveillance footage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060478629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.007
DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30690252
AN - SCOPUS:85060478629
SN - 0379-0738
VL - 296
SP - 57
EP - 66
JO - Forensic science international
JF - Forensic science international
ER -