Four years of farmer experimentation on soil fertility in Tigray, northern Ethiopia: trends in research strategies

Richard G. Kraaijvanger, A. Veldkamp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper analyses research strategies followed by farmer groups in Tigray, that were involved in participatory experimentation. Understanding choices made by farmers in such experimentation processes is important to understand reasons why farmers in Tigray often hesitated to adopt recommended practices.

Design/Methodology/Approach: A participatory experimentation approach was followed to arrive at recommendations matching with local preferences and context. In total, 16 groups of 5 farmers were monitored during 4 years.

We monitored research strategy of the farmer groups by considering the following: (1) the type of treatments, (2) the inclusion of responsive treatments, (3) the actual responses achieved and (4) the treatments perceived optimal.

Findings: We found that the farmer groups followed a very rational, context-rooted strategy that, e.g. in its focus on straw production and the use of combinations of organic and mineral fertilizers, differed from that of the researchers.

Practical implications: Farmers often follow research strategies different from standard scientific approaches. Consequently, in participatory experimentation, involvement of farmers in defining the actual experimental design is required to deal with local preferences and context.

Theoretical implications: Outcomes of participatory experimentation are directly relevant for further outscaling of the technologies involved. In addition, insights and understanding obtained also might support upscaling in the form of designing rural development policies.

Originality/Value: Participatory experimentation processes are applied in development work for different reasons but often concentrate primarily on direct outputs. For development workers engaged in such processes, it is important to realize that actual involvement of participants in the whole process is equally important.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-391
JournalJournal of agricultural education and extension
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

research planning
Ethiopia
soil fertility
Fertility
fertility
farmer
Soil
farmers
trend
Research
participatory approach
upscaling
rural development
experimental design
straw
fertilizer
methodology
Group
mineral
rural policy

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

@article{0e03971505e84663b2aad0ad560903ed,
title = "Four years of farmer experimentation on soil fertility in Tigray, northern Ethiopia: trends in research strategies",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper analyses research strategies followed by farmer groups in Tigray, that were involved in participatory experimentation. Understanding choices made by farmers in such experimentation processes is important to understand reasons why farmers in Tigray often hesitated to adopt recommended practices.Design/Methodology/Approach: A participatory experimentation approach was followed to arrive at recommendations matching with local preferences and context. In total, 16 groups of 5 farmers were monitored during 4 years.We monitored research strategy of the farmer groups by considering the following: (1) the type of treatments, (2) the inclusion of responsive treatments, (3) the actual responses achieved and (4) the treatments perceived optimal.Findings: We found that the farmer groups followed a very rational, context-rooted strategy that, e.g. in its focus on straw production and the use of combinations of organic and mineral fertilizers, differed from that of the researchers.Practical implications: Farmers often follow research strategies different from standard scientific approaches. Consequently, in participatory experimentation, involvement of farmers in defining the actual experimental design is required to deal with local preferences and context.Theoretical implications: Outcomes of participatory experimentation are directly relevant for further outscaling of the technologies involved. In addition, insights and understanding obtained also might support upscaling in the form of designing rural development policies.Originality/Value: Participatory experimentation processes are applied in development work for different reasons but often concentrate primarily on direct outputs. For development workers engaged in such processes, it is important to realize that actual involvement of participants in the whole process is equally important.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Kraaijvanger, {Richard G.} and A. Veldkamp",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/1389224X.2017.1289962",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "373--391",
journal = "Journal of agricultural education and extension",
issn = "1389-224X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Four years of farmer experimentation on soil fertility in Tigray, northern Ethiopia : trends in research strategies. / Kraaijvanger, Richard G.; Veldkamp, A.

In: Journal of agricultural education and extension, Vol. 23, No. 4, 08.08.2017, p. 373-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Four years of farmer experimentation on soil fertility in Tigray, northern Ethiopia

T2 - trends in research strategies

AU - Kraaijvanger, Richard G.

AU - Veldkamp, A.

PY - 2017/8/8

Y1 - 2017/8/8

N2 - Purpose: This paper analyses research strategies followed by farmer groups in Tigray, that were involved in participatory experimentation. Understanding choices made by farmers in such experimentation processes is important to understand reasons why farmers in Tigray often hesitated to adopt recommended practices.Design/Methodology/Approach: A participatory experimentation approach was followed to arrive at recommendations matching with local preferences and context. In total, 16 groups of 5 farmers were monitored during 4 years.We monitored research strategy of the farmer groups by considering the following: (1) the type of treatments, (2) the inclusion of responsive treatments, (3) the actual responses achieved and (4) the treatments perceived optimal.Findings: We found that the farmer groups followed a very rational, context-rooted strategy that, e.g. in its focus on straw production and the use of combinations of organic and mineral fertilizers, differed from that of the researchers.Practical implications: Farmers often follow research strategies different from standard scientific approaches. Consequently, in participatory experimentation, involvement of farmers in defining the actual experimental design is required to deal with local preferences and context.Theoretical implications: Outcomes of participatory experimentation are directly relevant for further outscaling of the technologies involved. In addition, insights and understanding obtained also might support upscaling in the form of designing rural development policies.Originality/Value: Participatory experimentation processes are applied in development work for different reasons but often concentrate primarily on direct outputs. For development workers engaged in such processes, it is important to realize that actual involvement of participants in the whole process is equally important.

AB - Purpose: This paper analyses research strategies followed by farmer groups in Tigray, that were involved in participatory experimentation. Understanding choices made by farmers in such experimentation processes is important to understand reasons why farmers in Tigray often hesitated to adopt recommended practices.Design/Methodology/Approach: A participatory experimentation approach was followed to arrive at recommendations matching with local preferences and context. In total, 16 groups of 5 farmers were monitored during 4 years.We monitored research strategy of the farmer groups by considering the following: (1) the type of treatments, (2) the inclusion of responsive treatments, (3) the actual responses achieved and (4) the treatments perceived optimal.Findings: We found that the farmer groups followed a very rational, context-rooted strategy that, e.g. in its focus on straw production and the use of combinations of organic and mineral fertilizers, differed from that of the researchers.Practical implications: Farmers often follow research strategies different from standard scientific approaches. Consequently, in participatory experimentation, involvement of farmers in defining the actual experimental design is required to deal with local preferences and context.Theoretical implications: Outcomes of participatory experimentation are directly relevant for further outscaling of the technologies involved. In addition, insights and understanding obtained also might support upscaling in the form of designing rural development policies.Originality/Value: Participatory experimentation processes are applied in development work for different reasons but often concentrate primarily on direct outputs. For development workers engaged in such processes, it is important to realize that actual involvement of participants in the whole process is equally important.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2017/isi/veldkamp_fou.pdf

U2 - 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1289962

DO - 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1289962

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 373

EP - 391

JO - Journal of agricultural education and extension

JF - Journal of agricultural education and extension

SN - 1389-224X

IS - 4

ER -