Framing mechanisms: the interpretive policy entrepreneur’s toolbox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
122 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Policy entrepreneurs were, originally, neither conceived to be active meaning-makers nor did they interact with other actors. They invested other resources such as time, energy, reputation and money in coupling problems, solutions and politics. Adding the interpretive dimension of interactional framing mechanisms turns them into interpretive policy entrepreneurs. This perspective improves our understanding of policy cases in which initial frame conflicts are resolved by extensive meaning-making work by one specific actor. We illustrate this interpretive policy entrepreneur concept with the innovative Sand Motor mega-sand nourishment scheme case, an artificial peninsula of 21 million m3 at the South Holland coast. Designed to achieve multiple aims, this coastal management scheme should serve coastal protection, nature development as well as recreational purposes. In the risk-averse, complex policy domain of Dutch coastal management, the provincial government of South Holland turned out to be an adept meaning-maker by linking other actors’ problem definitions to their proposed solution. Fourteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews put the provincial government at the heart of several framing interactions that led to frame convergence and ultimately the resolution of the initial frame conflict. Our interpretive analysis of framing interactions concludes that interactional framing mechanisms can reveal interpretive policy entrepreneurs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)406-427
Number of pages22
JournalCritical policy studies
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date11 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

entrepreneur
coastal protection
interaction
management
reputation
money
energy
politics
interview
resources

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • coastal management
  • Interactional framing mechanisms
  • interpretive policy entrepreneur
  • policy entrepreneur
  • the Netherlands
  • case study

Cite this

@article{41d963856b6f4dfd9feb971e79f6a46c,
title = "Framing mechanisms: the interpretive policy entrepreneur’s toolbox",
abstract = "Policy entrepreneurs were, originally, neither conceived to be active meaning-makers nor did they interact with other actors. They invested other resources such as time, energy, reputation and money in coupling problems, solutions and politics. Adding the interpretive dimension of interactional framing mechanisms turns them into interpretive policy entrepreneurs. This perspective improves our understanding of policy cases in which initial frame conflicts are resolved by extensive meaning-making work by one specific actor. We illustrate this interpretive policy entrepreneur concept with the innovative Sand Motor mega-sand nourishment scheme case, an artificial peninsula of 21 million m3 at the South Holland coast. Designed to achieve multiple aims, this coastal management scheme should serve coastal protection, nature development as well as recreational purposes. In the risk-averse, complex policy domain of Dutch coastal management, the provincial government of South Holland turned out to be an adept meaning-maker by linking other actors’ problem definitions to their proposed solution. Fourteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews put the provincial government at the heart of several framing interactions that led to frame convergence and ultimately the resolution of the initial frame conflict. Our interpretive analysis of framing interactions concludes that interactional framing mechanisms can reveal interpretive policy entrepreneurs.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, coastal management, Interactional framing mechanisms, interpretive policy entrepreneur, policy entrepreneur, the Netherlands, case study",
author = "Ewert Aukes and Lulofs, {Kristiaan R.D.} and Bressers, {Johannes T.A.}",
note = "Taylor and Francis deal",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/19460171.2017.1314219",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "406--427",
journal = "Critical policy studies",
issn = "1946-0171",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Framing mechanisms : the interpretive policy entrepreneur’s toolbox. / Aukes, Ewert (Corresponding Author); Lulofs, Kristiaan R.D.; Bressers, Johannes T.A.

In: Critical policy studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, 04.2018, p. 406-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framing mechanisms

T2 - the interpretive policy entrepreneur’s toolbox

AU - Aukes, Ewert

AU - Lulofs, Kristiaan R.D.

AU - Bressers, Johannes T.A.

N1 - Taylor and Francis deal

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Policy entrepreneurs were, originally, neither conceived to be active meaning-makers nor did they interact with other actors. They invested other resources such as time, energy, reputation and money in coupling problems, solutions and politics. Adding the interpretive dimension of interactional framing mechanisms turns them into interpretive policy entrepreneurs. This perspective improves our understanding of policy cases in which initial frame conflicts are resolved by extensive meaning-making work by one specific actor. We illustrate this interpretive policy entrepreneur concept with the innovative Sand Motor mega-sand nourishment scheme case, an artificial peninsula of 21 million m3 at the South Holland coast. Designed to achieve multiple aims, this coastal management scheme should serve coastal protection, nature development as well as recreational purposes. In the risk-averse, complex policy domain of Dutch coastal management, the provincial government of South Holland turned out to be an adept meaning-maker by linking other actors’ problem definitions to their proposed solution. Fourteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews put the provincial government at the heart of several framing interactions that led to frame convergence and ultimately the resolution of the initial frame conflict. Our interpretive analysis of framing interactions concludes that interactional framing mechanisms can reveal interpretive policy entrepreneurs.

AB - Policy entrepreneurs were, originally, neither conceived to be active meaning-makers nor did they interact with other actors. They invested other resources such as time, energy, reputation and money in coupling problems, solutions and politics. Adding the interpretive dimension of interactional framing mechanisms turns them into interpretive policy entrepreneurs. This perspective improves our understanding of policy cases in which initial frame conflicts are resolved by extensive meaning-making work by one specific actor. We illustrate this interpretive policy entrepreneur concept with the innovative Sand Motor mega-sand nourishment scheme case, an artificial peninsula of 21 million m3 at the South Holland coast. Designed to achieve multiple aims, this coastal management scheme should serve coastal protection, nature development as well as recreational purposes. In the risk-averse, complex policy domain of Dutch coastal management, the provincial government of South Holland turned out to be an adept meaning-maker by linking other actors’ problem definitions to their proposed solution. Fourteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews put the provincial government at the heart of several framing interactions that led to frame convergence and ultimately the resolution of the initial frame conflict. Our interpretive analysis of framing interactions concludes that interactional framing mechanisms can reveal interpretive policy entrepreneurs.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - coastal management

KW - Interactional framing mechanisms

KW - interpretive policy entrepreneur

KW - policy entrepreneur

KW - the Netherlands

KW - case study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017443549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2017.1314219

DO - 10.1080/19460171.2017.1314219

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 406

EP - 427

JO - Critical policy studies

JF - Critical policy studies

SN - 1946-0171

IS - 4

ER -