Abstract
Many mathematical and intuitive methods for constraint analysis of mechanisms have been proposed. In this article we compare three methods. Method one is based on Grüblers equation. Method two uses an intuitive analysis method based on opening kinematic loops and evaluating the constraints at the intersection. Method three uses a flexible multibody modeling approach which facilitates the analysis of complex systems. We demonstrate a visualization method using generalized von Mises stress to show overconstraint modes. A four bar mechanism and a two-degree-of- freedom (DOF) flexure-based mechanism serve as a case study. Briefly the optimization of the location and orientation of releases is discussed. The implementation of the releases in the flexure-based two DOF mechanism is presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings ASPE 2011 Annual Meeting |
| Subtitle of host publication | November 13-18, 2011 |
| Place of Publication | Raleigh, NC |
| Publisher | American Society for Precision Engineering |
| Pages | - |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Nov 2011 |
| Event | 26th ASPE Annual Meeting 2011 - Denver Marriott City Center Hotel, Denver, United States Duration: 13 Nov 2011 → 17 Nov 2011 Conference number: 26 http://aspe.net/publications/Annual_2011/ASPE_2011_Proceedings_VOL52.pdf |
Conference
| Conference | 26th ASPE Annual Meeting 2011 |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| City | Denver |
| Period | 13/11/11 → 17/11/11 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- IR-87886
- METIS-279508
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Freedom and constraint analysis and optimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Brouwer, D. M., Boer, S., Aarts, R. G. K. M., Meijaard, J. P., & Jonker, J. B. (2011). Freedom and constraint analysis and optimization. In Proceedings ASPE 2011 Annual Meeting: November 13-18, 2011 (pp. -). Raleigh, NC: American Society for Precision Engineering.