From an Eco-Relational Approach to Ecologically Responsible Robot Ethics

Anna Puzio*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this reply, I respond to Joshua C. Gellers’ commentary on my article “Not Relational Enough? Towards an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics” (Puzio, 2024a), in which I present a deeply relational, “eco-relational approach”. This approach asserts that it is necessary to consider the relationality with non-human entities such as animals and technology on a deeper level than has been done in robot ethics so far. This disrupts traditional ethical concepts. In his commentary “Not Ecological Enough: A Commentary on an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics” (2024), Gellers raises criticisms of my method and the consequences of the eco-relational approach. In this reply, I address these criticisms and focus especially on the ecological responsibility of the eco-relational approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article number83
JournalPhilosophy and Technology
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Environment
  • Ethics of technology
  • Non-human
  • Relational
  • Robots
  • Ecological

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From an Eco-Relational Approach to Ecologically Responsible Robot Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this