Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Peter M. ten Klooster, J.C.M. Oostveen, Johanna C.M. Oostveen, Linda C. Zandbelt, Erik Taal, Constance H.C. Drossaert, Etelka J. Harmsen, Mart A F J van de Laar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To examine the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods A cross-sectional sample of 224 outpatients with OA completed a survey containing the Dutch PEPPI-5 and other standardized measures assessing perceived health-management skills, general self-efficacy, social support, and health-related quality of life. A subsample of 100 patients completed the PEPPI-5 again approximately 3 weeks later. Results Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for a unidimensional model of the PEPPI-5. Additionally, the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). As hypothesized, the PEPPI-5 was strongly correlated with perceived health-management skills, moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health, and not with physical aspects of health. Contrary to expectations, however, it was not correlated with general self-efficacy. Conclusion The Dutch PEPPI-5 demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in patients with OA
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)125-130
JournalPatient education and counseling
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • IR-83755
  • METIS-290080

Cite this

@article{0a234ae762c447caa0f5b766c862de78,
title = "Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis",
abstract = "Objective To examine the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods A cross-sectional sample of 224 outpatients with OA completed a survey containing the Dutch PEPPI-5 and other standardized measures assessing perceived health-management skills, general self-efficacy, social support, and health-related quality of life. A subsample of 100 patients completed the PEPPI-5 again approximately 3 weeks later. Results Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for a unidimensional model of the PEPPI-5. Additionally, the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). As hypothesized, the PEPPI-5 was strongly correlated with perceived health-management skills, moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health, and not with physical aspects of health. Contrary to expectations, however, it was not correlated with general self-efficacy. Conclusion The Dutch PEPPI-5 demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in patients with OA",
keywords = "IR-83755, METIS-290080",
author = "{ten Klooster}, {Peter M.} and J.C.M. Oostveen and Oostveen, {Johanna C.M.} and Zandbelt, {Linda C.} and Erik Taal and Drossaert, {Constance H.C.} and Harmsen, {Etelka J.} and {van de Laar}, {Mart A F J}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2001.07.017",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "87",
pages = "125--130",
journal = "Patient education and counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis. / ten Klooster, Peter M.; Oostveen, J.C.M.; Oostveen, Johanna C.M.; Zandbelt, Linda C.; Taal, Erik; Drossaert, Constance H.C.; Harmsen, Etelka J.; van de Laar, Mart A F J.

In: Patient education and counseling, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2012, p. 125-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis

AU - ten Klooster, Peter M.

AU - Oostveen, J.C.M.

AU - Oostveen, Johanna C.M.

AU - Zandbelt, Linda C.

AU - Taal, Erik

AU - Drossaert, Constance H.C.

AU - Harmsen, Etelka J.

AU - van de Laar, Mart A F J

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objective To examine the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods A cross-sectional sample of 224 outpatients with OA completed a survey containing the Dutch PEPPI-5 and other standardized measures assessing perceived health-management skills, general self-efficacy, social support, and health-related quality of life. A subsample of 100 patients completed the PEPPI-5 again approximately 3 weeks later. Results Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for a unidimensional model of the PEPPI-5. Additionally, the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). As hypothesized, the PEPPI-5 was strongly correlated with perceived health-management skills, moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health, and not with physical aspects of health. Contrary to expectations, however, it was not correlated with general self-efficacy. Conclusion The Dutch PEPPI-5 demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in patients with OA

AB - Objective To examine the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods A cross-sectional sample of 224 outpatients with OA completed a survey containing the Dutch PEPPI-5 and other standardized measures assessing perceived health-management skills, general self-efficacy, social support, and health-related quality of life. A subsample of 100 patients completed the PEPPI-5 again approximately 3 weeks later. Results Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for a unidimensional model of the PEPPI-5. Additionally, the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). As hypothesized, the PEPPI-5 was strongly correlated with perceived health-management skills, moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health, and not with physical aspects of health. Contrary to expectations, however, it was not correlated with general self-efficacy. Conclusion The Dutch PEPPI-5 demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in patients with OA

KW - IR-83755

KW - METIS-290080

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2001.07.017

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2001.07.017

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 125

EP - 130

JO - Patient education and counseling

JF - Patient education and counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -