Geestelijke gezondheid als positieve uitkomst van behandeling: een empirische vergelijking van drie meetinstrumenten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

MENTAL HEALTH AS POSITIVE TREATMENT OUTCOME: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF THREE INSTRUMENTS Mental health or well-being is more than the absence of psychopathology. Mental health has been operationalized as well-being that comprises of emotional, psychological and social well-being. Research has shown that that psychopathology and well-being are related but distinct continua. As a consequence, in order to develop preventive and curative interventions, it is important to not only study the effects of treatments on psychopathology but on well-being as well, e.g. as part of routine outcome monitoring in health care. In this paper the results are presented of a study on the reliability and validity of three import instruments measuring well-being: the mental health continuum – short form (mhc-sf), the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (wemwbs) and the Flourishing Scale (fs). It is concluded that the mhc-sf, fs and wemwbs are all three reliable and valid instruments for measuring well-being. The mhc-sf has the most comprehensive theoretical underpinnings and has been studied most elaborately.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)48-56
JournalPsycholoog
Volume2016
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • METIS-319104
  • IR-102292

Cite this