TY - JOUR
T1 - Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer
T2 - A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting
AU - Mehra, Niven
AU - Kloots, Iris
AU - Vlaming, Michiel
AU - Aluwini, Shafak
AU - Dewulf, Els
AU - Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
AU - van der Poel, Henk
AU - Stoevelaar, Herman
AU - Yakar, Derya
AU - Bangma, Chris H.
AU - Bekers, Elise
AU - van den Bergh, Roderick
AU - Bergman, Andries M.
AU - van den Berkmortel, Franchette
AU - Boudewijns, Steve
AU - Dinjens, Winand N.M.
AU - Fütterer, Jurgen
AU - van der Hulle, Tom
AU - Jenster, Guido
AU - Kroeze, Leonie I.
AU - van Kruchten, Michel
AU - van Leenders, Geert
AU - van Leeuwen, Pim J.
AU - de Leng, Wendy W.J.
AU - van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
AU - Noordzij, Walter
AU - Oldenburg, Rogier A.
AU - van Oort, Inge M.
AU - Oving, Irma
AU - Schalken, Jack A.
AU - Schoots, Ivo G.
AU - Schuuring, Ed
AU - Smeenk, Robert J.
AU - Vanneste, Ben G.L.
AU - Vegt, Erik
AU - Vis, André N.
AU - de Vries, Kim
AU - Willemse, Peter Paul M.
AU - Wondergem, Maurits
AU - Ausems, Margreet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined. Objective: To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa. Design, setting, and participants: The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Results and limitations: Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hereditary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveillance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as follows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline. Conclusions: The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa. Patient summary: A group of Dutch specialists discussed the use of germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, indication of these tests (which patients and when), and impact of these tests on the management and treatment of PCa.
AB - Background: Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined. Objective: To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa. Design, setting, and participants: The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Results and limitations: Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hereditary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveillance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as follows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline. Conclusions: The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa. Patient summary: A group of Dutch specialists discussed the use of germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, indication of these tests (which patients and when), and impact of these tests on the management and treatment of PCa.
KW - BRCA1/2
KW - Castration-resistant prostate cancer
KW - DNA damage repair
KW - Genetic counselling
KW - Germline genetic testing
KW - Mismatch repair
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Tumour genetic testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146681760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.011
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146681760
SN - 2666-1691
VL - 49
SP - 23
EP - 31
JO - European Urology Open Science
JF - European Urology Open Science
ER -