Getting away with foul play? The importance of formal and informal oversight institutions for electoral integrity

Sarah Birch*, Carolien van Ham

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Electoral integrity is increasingly being recognised as an important component of democracy, yet scholars still have limited understanding of the circumstances under which elections are most likely to be free, fair and genuine. This article posits that effective oversight institutions play a key role in scrutinising the electoral process and holding those with an interest in the electoral outcome to account. The main insight is that deficiencies in formal electoral management can be effectively compensated for via one or more other institutional checks: an active and independent judiciary; an active and independent media; and/or an active and independent civil society. Flawed elections are most likely to take place when all four checks on electoral conduct fail in key ways. These hypotheses are tested and supported on a cross-national time-series dataset of 1,047 national-level elections held in 156 electoral regimes between 1990 and 2012.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)487-511
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean journal of political research
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Electoral commissions
  • Electoral integrity
  • Electoral management
  • Fraud

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Getting away with foul play? The importance of formal and informal oversight institutions for electoral integrity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this