TY - JOUR
T1 - Good vibrations
T2 - tactile cueing for freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease
AU - Klaver, E.C.
AU - van Vugt, J.P.P.
AU - Bloem, B.R.
AU - van Wezel, R.J.A.
AU - Nonnekes, J.
AU - Tjepkema-Cloostermans, M. C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation (Legacy ID 16457), by OnePlanet research center with funding from the Province of Gelderland and by the “Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek–Toegepaste en Technische wetenschappen” (NWO-TTW) Crossover program under the Innovative NeuroTechnology for Society (INTENSE) project. The Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders was supported by a center of excellence grant by the Parkinson Foundation. Dr. Nonnekes reports grants from ZonMW, Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, Parkinson Foundation and Gossweiler Foundation outside the submitted work.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank J. Janssen for annotating the video data of the Radboudumc measurement site. We would like to thank the students of Technical Medicine and Industrial Engineering at the University of Twente for their support during the measurements.
Funding Information:
Dr. Nonnekes serves at the advisory board of Cue2Walk and Ceriter. Prof. Bloem serves as the co-Editor in Chief for the Journal of Parkinson’s disease, serves on the editorial board of Practical Neurology and Digital Biomarkers, has received fees from serving on the scientific advisory board for UCB, Kyowa Kirin, Zambon and the Critical Path Institute (paid to the Institute), has received fees for speaking at conferences from AbbVie, Biogen, UCB, Zambon, Roche, GE Healthcare, Oruen, Novartis and Bial (paid to the Institute), and has received research support from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, the Michael J Fox Foundation, UCB, the Stichting Parkinson Fonds, Hersenstichting Nederland, de Stichting Woelse Waard, Stichting Alkemade-Keuls, de Maag Lever Darm Stichting, Parkinson NL, Davis Phinney Foundation, the Parkinson’s Foundation, Verily Life Sciences, Horizon 2020, the Topsector Life Sciences and Health, Nothing Impossible and the Parkinson Vereniging, outside the submitted work. Prof. Bloem does not hold any stocks or stock options with any companies that are connected to Parkinson’s disease or to any of the topics in this paper. Prof. van Wezel serves at the Board of the Hemianopia Stichting.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Background: Cueing strategies can alleviate freezing of gait (FOG) in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). We evaluated tactile cueing delivered via vibrating socks, which has the benefit of not being noticeable to bystanders. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tactile cueing compared to auditory cueing on FOG. Methods: Thirty-one persons with PD with FOG performed gait tasks during both ON and OFF state. The effect of open loop and closed loop tactile cueing, as delivered by vibrating socks, was compared to an active control group (auditory cueing) and to a baseline condition (uncued gait). These four conditions were balanced between subjects. Gait tasks were videotaped and annotated for FOG by two experienced raters. Motion data were collected to analyze spatiotemporal gait parameters. Responders were defined as manifesting a relative reduction of > 10% in the percent time frozen compared to uncued gait. Results: The average percent time frozen during uncued gait was 11.2% in ON and 21.5% in OFF state. None of the three tested cueing modalities affected the percentage of time frozen in either the ON (p = 0.20) or OFF state (p = 0.12). The number of FOG episodes and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also not affected. We found that 22 out of 31 subjects responded to cueing, the response to the three types of cueing was highly individual. Conclusions: Cueing did not improve FOG at the group level; however, tactile as well as auditory cueing improved FOG in many individuals. This highlights the need for a personalized approach when using cueing to treat FOG.
AB - Background: Cueing strategies can alleviate freezing of gait (FOG) in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). We evaluated tactile cueing delivered via vibrating socks, which has the benefit of not being noticeable to bystanders. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tactile cueing compared to auditory cueing on FOG. Methods: Thirty-one persons with PD with FOG performed gait tasks during both ON and OFF state. The effect of open loop and closed loop tactile cueing, as delivered by vibrating socks, was compared to an active control group (auditory cueing) and to a baseline condition (uncued gait). These four conditions were balanced between subjects. Gait tasks were videotaped and annotated for FOG by two experienced raters. Motion data were collected to analyze spatiotemporal gait parameters. Responders were defined as manifesting a relative reduction of > 10% in the percent time frozen compared to uncued gait. Results: The average percent time frozen during uncued gait was 11.2% in ON and 21.5% in OFF state. None of the three tested cueing modalities affected the percentage of time frozen in either the ON (p = 0.20) or OFF state (p = 0.12). The number of FOG episodes and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also not affected. We found that 22 out of 31 subjects responded to cueing, the response to the three types of cueing was highly individual. Conclusions: Cueing did not improve FOG at the group level; however, tactile as well as auditory cueing improved FOG in many individuals. This highlights the need for a personalized approach when using cueing to treat FOG.
KW - Cues
KW - Feedback
KW - Gait disorders/neurologic
KW - Haptic feedback technology
KW - Parkinson’s disease
KW - Parkinson’s disease/therapy
KW - Wearable electronic devices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150505716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00415-023-11663-9
DO - 10.1007/s00415-023-11663-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 36944760
AN - SCOPUS:85150505716
SN - 0340-5354
VL - 270
SP - 3424
EP - 3432
JO - Journal of neurology
JF - Journal of neurology
IS - 7
ER -