Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort

Ruben Broekhuizen, Tim De Rydt, Eric Lutters, Roland Ten Klooster, Guido De Bruyne

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Bicycle helmets help reducing head injuries in cycling accidents, but they are not always popular. Discomfort is a major barrier for bicycle helmet use. Improper anthropometric design of the inner structure of a helmet can result in local peak pressure on the skin of the scalp. The purpose of this study was to examine the spatial variations in maximum allowed pressure on the head. Mean maximum allowed pressure on the head was 13,2N (SE 0,2) for females and 16,5N (SE 0,2) for men. The superior frontal area (19,4N, SE 0,7) and the central occipital area (18,3N, SE 0,7N) were the least sensitive areas for male test persons. For females, also the central occipital area had a low sensitivity. In contrast, the inferior frontal area was the most sensitive for men (12,4N SE 0,7N) and women (9,7N SE 0,8N). Headgear should avoid pressure points in areas with high sensitivity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAdvances in Ergonomics in Design
    Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA
    EditorsFrancisco Rebelo, Marcelo M. Soares
    Place of PublicationCham
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages14-19
    Number of pages6
    ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-94706-8
    ISBN (Print)978-3-319-94705-1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018
    Event9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, AHFE 2018 - Loews Sapphire Falls Resort, Orlando, United States
    Duration: 21 Jul 201825 Jul 2018
    Conference number: 9
    http://www.ahfe2018.org/

    Publication series

    NameAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
    PublisherSpringer
    Volume777
    ISSN (Print)2194-5357
    ISSN (Electronic)2194-5365

    Conference

    Conference9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, AHFE 2018
    Abbreviated titleAHFE
    CountryUnited States
    CityOrlando
    Period21/07/1825/07/18
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    Bicycles
    Skin
    Accidents

    Keywords

    • Head pressure sensitivity
    • Headgear
    • Human factors

    Cite this

    Broekhuizen, R., De Rydt, T., Lutters, E., Klooster, R. T., & De Bruyne, G. (2018). Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort. In F. Rebelo, & M. M. Soares (Eds.), Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA (pp. 14-19). (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 777). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_2
    Broekhuizen, Ruben ; De Rydt, Tim ; Lutters, Eric ; Klooster, Roland Ten ; De Bruyne, Guido. / Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort. Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA. editor / Francisco Rebelo ; Marcelo M. Soares. Cham : Springer, 2018. pp. 14-19 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing).
    @inproceedings{471254b6bff044688f20103fcd7fd4e8,
    title = "Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort",
    abstract = "Bicycle helmets help reducing head injuries in cycling accidents, but they are not always popular. Discomfort is a major barrier for bicycle helmet use. Improper anthropometric design of the inner structure of a helmet can result in local peak pressure on the skin of the scalp. The purpose of this study was to examine the spatial variations in maximum allowed pressure on the head. Mean maximum allowed pressure on the head was 13,2N (SE 0,2) for females and 16,5N (SE 0,2) for men. The superior frontal area (19,4N, SE 0,7) and the central occipital area (18,3N, SE 0,7N) were the least sensitive areas for male test persons. For females, also the central occipital area had a low sensitivity. In contrast, the inferior frontal area was the most sensitive for men (12,4N SE 0,7N) and women (9,7N SE 0,8N). Headgear should avoid pressure points in areas with high sensitivity.",
    keywords = "Head pressure sensitivity, Headgear, Human factors",
    author = "Ruben Broekhuizen and {De Rydt}, Tim and Eric Lutters and Klooster, {Roland Ten} and {De Bruyne}, Guido",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_2",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-3-319-94705-1",
    series = "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing",
    publisher = "Springer",
    pages = "14--19",
    editor = "Francisco Rebelo and Soares, {Marcelo M.}",
    booktitle = "Advances in Ergonomics in Design",

    }

    Broekhuizen, R, De Rydt, T, Lutters, E, Klooster, RT & De Bruyne, G 2018, Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort. in F Rebelo & MM Soares (eds), Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 777, Springer, Cham, pp. 14-19, 9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, AHFE 2018, Orlando, United States, 21/07/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_2

    Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort. / Broekhuizen, Ruben; De Rydt, Tim; Lutters, Eric; Klooster, Roland Ten; De Bruyne, Guido.

    Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA. ed. / Francisco Rebelo; Marcelo M. Soares. Cham : Springer, 2018. p. 14-19 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 777).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort

    AU - Broekhuizen, Ruben

    AU - De Rydt, Tim

    AU - Lutters, Eric

    AU - Klooster, Roland Ten

    AU - De Bruyne, Guido

    PY - 2018/6

    Y1 - 2018/6

    N2 - Bicycle helmets help reducing head injuries in cycling accidents, but they are not always popular. Discomfort is a major barrier for bicycle helmet use. Improper anthropometric design of the inner structure of a helmet can result in local peak pressure on the skin of the scalp. The purpose of this study was to examine the spatial variations in maximum allowed pressure on the head. Mean maximum allowed pressure on the head was 13,2N (SE 0,2) for females and 16,5N (SE 0,2) for men. The superior frontal area (19,4N, SE 0,7) and the central occipital area (18,3N, SE 0,7N) were the least sensitive areas for male test persons. For females, also the central occipital area had a low sensitivity. In contrast, the inferior frontal area was the most sensitive for men (12,4N SE 0,7N) and women (9,7N SE 0,8N). Headgear should avoid pressure points in areas with high sensitivity.

    AB - Bicycle helmets help reducing head injuries in cycling accidents, but they are not always popular. Discomfort is a major barrier for bicycle helmet use. Improper anthropometric design of the inner structure of a helmet can result in local peak pressure on the skin of the scalp. The purpose of this study was to examine the spatial variations in maximum allowed pressure on the head. Mean maximum allowed pressure on the head was 13,2N (SE 0,2) for females and 16,5N (SE 0,2) for men. The superior frontal area (19,4N, SE 0,7) and the central occipital area (18,3N, SE 0,7N) were the least sensitive areas for male test persons. For females, also the central occipital area had a low sensitivity. In contrast, the inferior frontal area was the most sensitive for men (12,4N SE 0,7N) and women (9,7N SE 0,8N). Headgear should avoid pressure points in areas with high sensitivity.

    KW - Head pressure sensitivity

    KW - Headgear

    KW - Human factors

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049686078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_2

    DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_2

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 978-3-319-94705-1

    T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

    SP - 14

    EP - 19

    BT - Advances in Ergonomics in Design

    A2 - Rebelo, Francisco

    A2 - Soares, Marcelo M.

    PB - Springer

    CY - Cham

    ER -

    Broekhuizen R, De Rydt T, Lutters E, Klooster RT, De Bruyne G. Head Sensitivity for Designing Bicycle Helmets with Improved Physical Comfort. In Rebelo F, Soares MM, editors, Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Ergonomics in Design, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA. Cham: Springer. 2018. p. 14-19. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_2