Heuristic approaches to models and modeling in systems biology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Prediction and control sufficient for reliable medical and other interventions are prominent aims of modeling in systems biology. The short-term attainment of these goals has played a strong role in projecting the importance and value of the field. In this paper I identify the standard models must meet to achieve these objectives as predictive robustness—predictive reliability over large domains. Drawing on the results of an ethnographic investigation and various studies in the systems biology literature, I explore four current obstacles to achieving predictive robustness; data constraints, parameter uncertainty, collaborative constraints and system-scale requirements. I use a case study and the commentary of systems biologists themselves to show that current practices in the field, rather than pursuing these goals, frequently use models heuristically to investigate and build understanding of biological systems that do not meet standards of predictive robustness but are nonetheless effective uses of computation. A more heuristic conception of modeling allows us to interpret current practices as ways that manage these obstacles more effectively, particularly collaborative constraints, such that modelers can in the long-run at least work towards prediction and control.
LanguageEnglish
Pages353-372
JournalBiology and philosophy
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Systems Biology
Biological Sciences
Uncertainty
parameter uncertainty
prediction
biologists
case studies
Heuristics
Robustness
Modeling
Prediction

Keywords

  • METIS-318905
  • IR-102105

Cite this

@article{a9ed9eb7cdf547c7bbf13cdc74ef9e42,
title = "Heuristic approaches to models and modeling in systems biology",
abstract = "Prediction and control sufficient for reliable medical and other interventions are prominent aims of modeling in systems biology. The short-term attainment of these goals has played a strong role in projecting the importance and value of the field. In this paper I identify the standard models must meet to achieve these objectives as predictive robustness—predictive reliability over large domains. Drawing on the results of an ethnographic investigation and various studies in the systems biology literature, I explore four current obstacles to achieving predictive robustness; data constraints, parameter uncertainty, collaborative constraints and system-scale requirements. I use a case study and the commentary of systems biologists themselves to show that current practices in the field, rather than pursuing these goals, frequently use models heuristically to investigate and build understanding of biological systems that do not meet standards of predictive robustness but are nonetheless effective uses of computation. A more heuristic conception of modeling allows us to interpret current practices as ways that manage these obstacles more effectively, particularly collaborative constraints, such that modelers can in the long-run at least work towards prediction and control.",
keywords = "METIS-318905, IR-102105",
author = "MacLeod, {Miles Alexander James}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s10539-015-9491-1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "353--372",
journal = "Biology and philosophy",
issn = "0169-3867",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Heuristic approaches to models and modeling in systems biology. / MacLeod, Miles Alexander James.

In: Biology and philosophy, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2016, p. 353-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heuristic approaches to models and modeling in systems biology

AU - MacLeod,Miles Alexander James

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Prediction and control sufficient for reliable medical and other interventions are prominent aims of modeling in systems biology. The short-term attainment of these goals has played a strong role in projecting the importance and value of the field. In this paper I identify the standard models must meet to achieve these objectives as predictive robustness—predictive reliability over large domains. Drawing on the results of an ethnographic investigation and various studies in the systems biology literature, I explore four current obstacles to achieving predictive robustness; data constraints, parameter uncertainty, collaborative constraints and system-scale requirements. I use a case study and the commentary of systems biologists themselves to show that current practices in the field, rather than pursuing these goals, frequently use models heuristically to investigate and build understanding of biological systems that do not meet standards of predictive robustness but are nonetheless effective uses of computation. A more heuristic conception of modeling allows us to interpret current practices as ways that manage these obstacles more effectively, particularly collaborative constraints, such that modelers can in the long-run at least work towards prediction and control.

AB - Prediction and control sufficient for reliable medical and other interventions are prominent aims of modeling in systems biology. The short-term attainment of these goals has played a strong role in projecting the importance and value of the field. In this paper I identify the standard models must meet to achieve these objectives as predictive robustness—predictive reliability over large domains. Drawing on the results of an ethnographic investigation and various studies in the systems biology literature, I explore four current obstacles to achieving predictive robustness; data constraints, parameter uncertainty, collaborative constraints and system-scale requirements. I use a case study and the commentary of systems biologists themselves to show that current practices in the field, rather than pursuing these goals, frequently use models heuristically to investigate and build understanding of biological systems that do not meet standards of predictive robustness but are nonetheless effective uses of computation. A more heuristic conception of modeling allows us to interpret current practices as ways that manage these obstacles more effectively, particularly collaborative constraints, such that modelers can in the long-run at least work towards prediction and control.

KW - METIS-318905

KW - IR-102105

U2 - 10.1007/s10539-015-9491-1

DO - 10.1007/s10539-015-9491-1

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 353

EP - 372

JO - Biology and philosophy

T2 - Biology and philosophy

JF - Biology and philosophy

SN - 0169-3867

IS - 3

ER -