Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems

Robert Hoppe (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article is an attempt to bridge the divide between academics and practitioners. Informed by both design theory and the reality of policy work, its focus is on ‘problems’. From a practitioners’ perspective, policy design is both an intellectual and political process, an inevitable oscillation between ‘puzzling’ and ‘powering’, in which ‘messy’ or unstructured problems are re-structured from problems as webs of ‘undesirable situations’ to problems as specific, time-and-space bound ‘opportunities for improvement’. This requires a questioning habitus in practitioners of policy design. Using a socio-cognitive theory of problem processing, this paper shows how policy design is an iterative process of problem sensing, problem categorization, problem decomposition and problem definition. For each of these stages, appropriate rules-of-thumb for questioning and answering can be suggested that induce thought habits and styles for responsive and solid policy designs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-408
Number of pages25
JournalPublic Policy and Administration
Volume33
Issue number4
Early online date4 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

heuristics
cognitive theory
habits

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

@article{0c54d46a39ad4026a003d4840037f0d4,
title = "Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems",
abstract = "This article is an attempt to bridge the divide between academics and practitioners. Informed by both design theory and the reality of policy work, its focus is on ‘problems’. From a practitioners’ perspective, policy design is both an intellectual and political process, an inevitable oscillation between ‘puzzling’ and ‘powering’, in which ‘messy’ or unstructured problems are re-structured from problems as webs of ‘undesirable situations’ to problems as specific, time-and-space bound ‘opportunities for improvement’. This requires a questioning habitus in practitioners of policy design. Using a socio-cognitive theory of problem processing, this paper shows how policy design is an iterative process of problem sensing, problem categorization, problem decomposition and problem definition. For each of these stages, appropriate rules-of-thumb for questioning and answering can be suggested that induce thought habits and styles for responsive and solid policy designs.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "Robert Hoppe",
note = "Sage deal",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0952076717709338",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "384--408",
journal = "Public Policy and Administration",
issn = "0952-0767",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Heuristics for practitioners of policy design : Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems. / Hoppe, Robert (Corresponding Author).

In: Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 384-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heuristics for practitioners of policy design

T2 - Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems

AU - Hoppe, Robert

N1 - Sage deal

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - This article is an attempt to bridge the divide between academics and practitioners. Informed by both design theory and the reality of policy work, its focus is on ‘problems’. From a practitioners’ perspective, policy design is both an intellectual and political process, an inevitable oscillation between ‘puzzling’ and ‘powering’, in which ‘messy’ or unstructured problems are re-structured from problems as webs of ‘undesirable situations’ to problems as specific, time-and-space bound ‘opportunities for improvement’. This requires a questioning habitus in practitioners of policy design. Using a socio-cognitive theory of problem processing, this paper shows how policy design is an iterative process of problem sensing, problem categorization, problem decomposition and problem definition. For each of these stages, appropriate rules-of-thumb for questioning and answering can be suggested that induce thought habits and styles for responsive and solid policy designs.

AB - This article is an attempt to bridge the divide between academics and practitioners. Informed by both design theory and the reality of policy work, its focus is on ‘problems’. From a practitioners’ perspective, policy design is both an intellectual and political process, an inevitable oscillation between ‘puzzling’ and ‘powering’, in which ‘messy’ or unstructured problems are re-structured from problems as webs of ‘undesirable situations’ to problems as specific, time-and-space bound ‘opportunities for improvement’. This requires a questioning habitus in practitioners of policy design. Using a socio-cognitive theory of problem processing, this paper shows how policy design is an iterative process of problem sensing, problem categorization, problem decomposition and problem definition. For each of these stages, appropriate rules-of-thumb for questioning and answering can be suggested that induce thought habits and styles for responsive and solid policy designs.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

U2 - 10.1177/0952076717709338

DO - 10.1177/0952076717709338

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 384

EP - 408

JO - Public Policy and Administration

JF - Public Policy and Administration

SN - 0952-0767

IS - 4

ER -