Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems

Robert Hoppe (Corresponding Author)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    37 Citations (Scopus)
    855 Downloads (Pure)


    This article is an attempt to bridge the divide between academics and practitioners. Informed by both design theory and the reality of policy work, its focus is on ‘problems’. From a practitioners’ perspective, policy design is both an intellectual and political process, an inevitable oscillation between ‘puzzling’ and ‘powering’, in which ‘messy’ or unstructured problems are re-structured from problems as webs of ‘undesirable situations’ to problems as specific, time-and-space bound ‘opportunities for improvement’. This requires a questioning habitus in practitioners of policy design. Using a socio-cognitive theory of problem processing, this paper shows how policy design is an iterative process of problem sensing, problem categorization, problem decomposition and problem definition. For each of these stages, appropriate rules-of-thumb for questioning and answering can be suggested that induce thought habits and styles for responsive and solid policy designs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)384-408
    Number of pages25
    JournalPublic Policy and Administration
    Issue number4
    Early online date4 Jun 2017
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018


    • UT-Hybrid-D


    Dive into the research topics of 'Heuristics for practitioners of policy design: Rules-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this