Hierarchy and Misalignments in Complex New Product Development Projects

Mohsen Jafari Songhori, Javad Nasiry, Michael Kirley

    Research output: Working paperProfessional

    Abstract

    Developing complex new products requires firms to break down the product into subsystems and create an organizational structure which ideally mirrors the product architecture. However, empirical evidence on the mirroring hypothesis is mixed and misalignments occur in the product and the corresponding organizational architectures. Misalignments take two general forms: (1) a missing link between two teams responsible for two interacting subsystems results in an unmatched interface and (2) two teams interacting without a link between their respective subsystems cause an unmatched interaction. In a model of product design as a search on a rugged landscape, we model misalignments as design teams searching on a “perceived” rather than “real” landscape. As a consequence, type-I or type-II errors are likely whereby the former causes the teams to reject superior designs and the latter to accept inferior designs. We study the performance deterioration by two measures: the magnitude and frequency of errors. We show that unmatched interactions cause a higher type-I error both in magnitude and frequency. Unmatched interactions and interfaces cause the same magnitude of type-II error but unmatched interfaces cause a higher frequency of type-II error. We further study how misalignments affect the convergence behavior of the search process, i.e., the time to converge and the quality of the final design. We find that misalignments affect, though not necessarily increase, the convergence time significantly but they are not a critical factor in the final design quality. We discuss the managerial implications of our results for the new product development projects.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherSocial Science Research Network (SSRN)
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Development projects
    Misalignment
    New product development
    Subsystem
    Interaction
    Type II error
    Critical factors
    Deterioration
    Empirical evidence
    Product design
    Breakdown
    New products
    Type I error
    Design quality
    Organizational architecture
    Product architecture
    Organizational structure

    Keywords

    • Complexity
    • Hierarchy
    • Misalignments
    • NK(C) simulation
    • Unmatched interactions
    • Unmatched interfaces

    Cite this

    Jafari Songhori, Mohsen ; Nasiry, Javad ; Kirley, Michael. / Hierarchy and Misalignments in Complex New Product Development Projects. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2014.
    @techreport{44808df128f04351a1557e60baf6e514,
    title = "Hierarchy and Misalignments in Complex New Product Development Projects",
    abstract = "Developing complex new products requires firms to break down the product into subsystems and create an organizational structure which ideally mirrors the product architecture. However, empirical evidence on the mirroring hypothesis is mixed and misalignments occur in the product and the corresponding organizational architectures. Misalignments take two general forms: (1) a missing link between two teams responsible for two interacting subsystems results in an unmatched interface and (2) two teams interacting without a link between their respective subsystems cause an unmatched interaction. In a model of product design as a search on a rugged landscape, we model misalignments as design teams searching on a “perceived” rather than “real” landscape. As a consequence, type-I or type-II errors are likely whereby the former causes the teams to reject superior designs and the latter to accept inferior designs. We study the performance deterioration by two measures: the magnitude and frequency of errors. We show that unmatched interactions cause a higher type-I error both in magnitude and frequency. Unmatched interactions and interfaces cause the same magnitude of type-II error but unmatched interfaces cause a higher frequency of type-II error. We further study how misalignments affect the convergence behavior of the search process, i.e., the time to converge and the quality of the final design. We find that misalignments affect, though not necessarily increase, the convergence time significantly but they are not a critical factor in the final design quality. We discuss the managerial implications of our results for the new product development projects.",
    keywords = "Complexity, Hierarchy, Misalignments, NK(C) simulation, Unmatched interactions, Unmatched interfaces",
    author = "{Jafari Songhori}, Mohsen and Javad Nasiry and Michael Kirley",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.2139/ssrn.2410178",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "Social Science Research Network (SSRN)",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Social Science Research Network (SSRN)",

    }

    Hierarchy and Misalignments in Complex New Product Development Projects. / Jafari Songhori, Mohsen; Nasiry, Javad; Kirley, Michael.

    Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2014.

    Research output: Working paperProfessional

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Hierarchy and Misalignments in Complex New Product Development Projects

    AU - Jafari Songhori, Mohsen

    AU - Nasiry, Javad

    AU - Kirley, Michael

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Developing complex new products requires firms to break down the product into subsystems and create an organizational structure which ideally mirrors the product architecture. However, empirical evidence on the mirroring hypothesis is mixed and misalignments occur in the product and the corresponding organizational architectures. Misalignments take two general forms: (1) a missing link between two teams responsible for two interacting subsystems results in an unmatched interface and (2) two teams interacting without a link between their respective subsystems cause an unmatched interaction. In a model of product design as a search on a rugged landscape, we model misalignments as design teams searching on a “perceived” rather than “real” landscape. As a consequence, type-I or type-II errors are likely whereby the former causes the teams to reject superior designs and the latter to accept inferior designs. We study the performance deterioration by two measures: the magnitude and frequency of errors. We show that unmatched interactions cause a higher type-I error both in magnitude and frequency. Unmatched interactions and interfaces cause the same magnitude of type-II error but unmatched interfaces cause a higher frequency of type-II error. We further study how misalignments affect the convergence behavior of the search process, i.e., the time to converge and the quality of the final design. We find that misalignments affect, though not necessarily increase, the convergence time significantly but they are not a critical factor in the final design quality. We discuss the managerial implications of our results for the new product development projects.

    AB - Developing complex new products requires firms to break down the product into subsystems and create an organizational structure which ideally mirrors the product architecture. However, empirical evidence on the mirroring hypothesis is mixed and misalignments occur in the product and the corresponding organizational architectures. Misalignments take two general forms: (1) a missing link between two teams responsible for two interacting subsystems results in an unmatched interface and (2) two teams interacting without a link between their respective subsystems cause an unmatched interaction. In a model of product design as a search on a rugged landscape, we model misalignments as design teams searching on a “perceived” rather than “real” landscape. As a consequence, type-I or type-II errors are likely whereby the former causes the teams to reject superior designs and the latter to accept inferior designs. We study the performance deterioration by two measures: the magnitude and frequency of errors. We show that unmatched interactions cause a higher type-I error both in magnitude and frequency. Unmatched interactions and interfaces cause the same magnitude of type-II error but unmatched interfaces cause a higher frequency of type-II error. We further study how misalignments affect the convergence behavior of the search process, i.e., the time to converge and the quality of the final design. We find that misalignments affect, though not necessarily increase, the convergence time significantly but they are not a critical factor in the final design quality. We discuss the managerial implications of our results for the new product development projects.

    KW - Complexity

    KW - Hierarchy

    KW - Misalignments

    KW - NK(C) simulation

    KW - Unmatched interactions

    KW - Unmatched interfaces

    U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.2410178

    DO - 10.2139/ssrn.2410178

    M3 - Working paper

    BT - Hierarchy and Misalignments in Complex New Product Development Projects

    PB - Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

    ER -