TY - JOUR
T1 - High-Frame-Rate Ultrasound Velocimetry in the Healthy Femoral Bifurcation
T2 - A Comparative Study Against 4-D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
AU - van Helvert, Majorie
AU - Ruisch, Janna
AU - de Bakker, Joosje M.K.
AU - Saris, Anne E.C.M.
AU - de Korte, Chris L.
AU - Versluis, Michel
AU - Groot Jebbink, Erik
AU - Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Objective: Local flow dynamics impact atherosclerosis yet are difficult to quantify with conventional ultrasound techniques. This study investigates the performance of ultrasound vector flow imaging (US-VFI) with and without ultrasound contrast agents in the healthy femoral bifurcation. Methods: High-frame-rate ultrasound data with incremental acoustic outputs were acquired in the femoral bifurcations of 20 healthy subjects before (50V) and after contrast injection (2V, 5V and 10V). 2-D blood-velocity profiles were obtained through native blood speckle tracking (BST) and contrast tracking (echo particle image velocimetry [echoPIV]). As a reference, 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging (4-D flow MRI) was acquired. Contrast-to-background ratio and vector correlation were used to assess the quality of the US-VFI acquisitions. Spatiotemporal velocity profiles were extracted, from which peak velocities (PSV) were compared between the modalities. Furthermore, root-mean-square error analysis was performed. Results: US-VFI was successful in 99% of the cases and optimal VFI quality was established with the 10V echoPIV and BST settings. A good correspondence between 10V echoPIV and BST was found, with a mean PSV difference of -0.5 cm/s (limits of agreement: -14.1–13.2). Both US-VFI techniques compared well with 4-D flow MRI, with a mean PSV difference of 1.4 cm/s (-18.7–21.6) between 10V echoPIV and MRI, and 0.3 cm/s (-23.8–24.4) between BST and MRI. Similar complex flow patterns among all modalities were observed. Conclusion: 2-D blood-flow quantification of femoral bifurcation is feasible with echoPIV and BST. Both modalities showed good agreement compared to 4-D flow MRI. For the femoral tract the administration of contrast was not needed to increase the echogenicity of the blood for optimal image quality.
AB - Objective: Local flow dynamics impact atherosclerosis yet are difficult to quantify with conventional ultrasound techniques. This study investigates the performance of ultrasound vector flow imaging (US-VFI) with and without ultrasound contrast agents in the healthy femoral bifurcation. Methods: High-frame-rate ultrasound data with incremental acoustic outputs were acquired in the femoral bifurcations of 20 healthy subjects before (50V) and after contrast injection (2V, 5V and 10V). 2-D blood-velocity profiles were obtained through native blood speckle tracking (BST) and contrast tracking (echo particle image velocimetry [echoPIV]). As a reference, 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging (4-D flow MRI) was acquired. Contrast-to-background ratio and vector correlation were used to assess the quality of the US-VFI acquisitions. Spatiotemporal velocity profiles were extracted, from which peak velocities (PSV) were compared between the modalities. Furthermore, root-mean-square error analysis was performed. Results: US-VFI was successful in 99% of the cases and optimal VFI quality was established with the 10V echoPIV and BST settings. A good correspondence between 10V echoPIV and BST was found, with a mean PSV difference of -0.5 cm/s (limits of agreement: -14.1–13.2). Both US-VFI techniques compared well with 4-D flow MRI, with a mean PSV difference of 1.4 cm/s (-18.7–21.6) between 10V echoPIV and MRI, and 0.3 cm/s (-23.8–24.4) between BST and MRI. Similar complex flow patterns among all modalities were observed. Conclusion: 2-D blood-flow quantification of femoral bifurcation is feasible with echoPIV and BST. Both modalities showed good agreement compared to 4-D flow MRI. For the femoral tract the administration of contrast was not needed to increase the echogenicity of the blood for optimal image quality.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Blood speckle tracking
KW - Blood-flow imaging
KW - Echo particle image velocimetry
KW - Femoral artery
KW - High-frame-rate ultrasound
KW - Ultrasound vector flow imaging
KW - 4-D flow MRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203289818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.05.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203289818
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 50
SP - 1755
EP - 1763
JO - Ultrasound in medicine and biology
JF - Ultrasound in medicine and biology
IS - 12
ER -