Hip fracture systems—European experience

Tim J.s. Chesser*, Dominic Inman, Antony Johansen, Alberto Belluati, Carlotta Pari, Achille Contini, Stijn.c. Voeten, Johannes H. Hegeman, Kornelis J. Ponsen, Nuria Montero-Fernández, Alberto Delgado-Martínez, Francisco Chana-Rodríguez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

15 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

European countries have established health care systems but are struggling with the increasing rise of fragility fractures in their aging population. In trying to address this significant burden, countries are establishing national guidelines and standards, focusing on hip fractures, which represent the significant cost for this patient group. This has evolved with the establishment of national audits and guidelines. Reports from 4 European countries (England, Italy, Netherlands, and Spain) are presented. All nations have identified both deficiencies in their systems, and protocols to improve these deficiences. When standards are introduced, there has been evidence of improved results. Significantly more work is needed to understand the key components of the systems and pathways, and efforts to study and standardize care are ongoing.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere050
Number of pages6
JournalOTA International
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hip fracture systems—European experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this