Abstract

Several European countries have been involved in the implementation of electronic forms of voting in elections. This may include electronic voting machines at polling stations, Internet voting, or both. In the former, the registration and counting of the votes is done electronically, but authentication of the voter and the protection of the secrecy of the ballot still depend on traditional means. In the latter, voting is done remotely from any computer, and the polling station is abolished as protective space. To allow observation of the elections (Vollan, 2006), it is deemed essential that the voting procedure be verifiable. From a technical perspective, the combination of voter anonymity and verifiability is challenging. However, even if a satisfactory technical solution were found, electronic forms of voting challenge the democratic process in other ways. Whereas technology once had the reputation of contributing to explicit goals in an instrumental way, philosophers have now realised that it also changes our experience and existence in ways that had not been intended. Moreover, many requirements of procedures to be automated are implicit, and the automated versions may thereby “act‿ differently. In this contribution, we analyse how electronic voting shapes democratic forms of voting from the perspective of technological mediation. First of all, we introduce the requirements that are generally accepted to apply to the voting process. We then zoom in on the history of electronic voting in the Netherlands, explain how the country finally abolished electronic voting, and recast the problems encountered in terms of implicit requirements. We then generalise the notion of implicit requirements to include broader forms of changes in human experience and existence, by referring to the philosophical work on technological mediation. Applying this theory to electronic voting, especially Internet voting, we identify challenges that we need to face, should electronic voting come back on the political agenda.
Original languageUndefined
Title of host publicationInnovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government
EditorsSimone van der Hof, Marga M. Groothuis
Place of PublicationThe Hague
PublisherT.M.C. Asser Press
Pages439-452
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)978-90-6704-730-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Publication series

NameInformation Technology and Law Series
PublisherT.M.C. Asser Press
Number20
Volume20
ISSN (Print)1570-2782

Fingerprint

voting
electronics
voter
mediation
election
Internet
procedure
perspective
process
anonymity
secrecy
political agenda
reputation
Netherlands
machine
observation
computer
human being
contribution
implementation

Keywords

  • METIS-279126
  • IR-75229
  • Electronic voting
  • EWI-19089
  • Technological mediation
  • SCS-Cybersecurity
  • implicit requirements

Cite this

Pieters, W. (2011). How devices transform voting. In S. van der Hof, & M. M. Groothuis (Eds.), Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government (pp. 439-452). (Information Technology and Law Series; Vol. 20, No. 20). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_24

Pieters, Wolter / How devices transform voting.

Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government. ed. / Simone van der Hof; Marga M. Groothuis. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2011. p. 439-452 (Information Technology and Law Series; Vol. 20, No. 20).

Research output: ScientificChapter

@inbook{29a637043020468abdaac86529cf4a5a,
title = "How devices transform voting",
abstract = "Several European countries have been involved in the implementation of electronic forms of voting in elections. This may include electronic voting machines at polling stations, Internet voting, or both. In the former, the registration and counting of the votes is done electronically, but authentication of the voter and the protection of the secrecy of the ballot still depend on traditional means. In the latter, voting is done remotely from any computer, and the polling station is abolished as protective space. To allow observation of the elections (Vollan, 2006), it is deemed essential that the voting procedure be verifiable. From a technical perspective, the combination of voter anonymity and verifiability is challenging. However, even if a satisfactory technical solution were found, electronic forms of voting challenge the democratic process in other ways. Whereas technology once had the reputation of contributing to explicit goals in an instrumental way, philosophers have now realised that it also changes our experience and existence in ways that had not been intended. Moreover, many requirements of procedures to be automated are implicit, and the automated versions may thereby “act‿ differently. In this contribution, we analyse how electronic voting shapes democratic forms of voting from the perspective of technological mediation. First of all, we introduce the requirements that are generally accepted to apply to the voting process. We then zoom in on the history of electronic voting in the Netherlands, explain how the country finally abolished electronic voting, and recast the problems encountered in terms of implicit requirements. We then generalise the notion of implicit requirements to include broader forms of changes in human experience and existence, by referring to the philosophical work on technological mediation. Applying this theory to electronic voting, especially Internet voting, we identify challenges that we need to face, should electronic voting come back on the political agenda.",
keywords = "METIS-279126, IR-75229, Electronic voting, EWI-19089, Technological mediation, SCS-Cybersecurity, implicit requirements",
author = "Wolter Pieters",
note = "This chapter is based on the author’s PhD thesis La volonté machinale: understanding the electronic voting controversy, written at Radboud University Nijmegen (Pieters, 2008).",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_24",
isbn = "978-90-6704-730-2",
series = "Information Technology and Law Series",
publisher = "T.M.C. Asser Press",
number = "20",
pages = "439--452",
editor = "{van der Hof}, Simone and Groothuis, {Marga M.}",
booktitle = "Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government",

}

Pieters, W 2011, How devices transform voting. in S van der Hof & MM Groothuis (eds), Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government. Information Technology and Law Series, no. 20, vol. 20, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp. 439-452. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_24

How devices transform voting. / Pieters, Wolter.

Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government. ed. / Simone van der Hof; Marga M. Groothuis. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2011. p. 439-452 (Information Technology and Law Series; Vol. 20, No. 20).

Research output: ScientificChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - How devices transform voting

AU - Pieters,Wolter

N1 - This chapter is based on the author’s PhD thesis La volonté machinale: understanding the electronic voting controversy, written at Radboud University Nijmegen (Pieters, 2008).

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Several European countries have been involved in the implementation of electronic forms of voting in elections. This may include electronic voting machines at polling stations, Internet voting, or both. In the former, the registration and counting of the votes is done electronically, but authentication of the voter and the protection of the secrecy of the ballot still depend on traditional means. In the latter, voting is done remotely from any computer, and the polling station is abolished as protective space. To allow observation of the elections (Vollan, 2006), it is deemed essential that the voting procedure be verifiable. From a technical perspective, the combination of voter anonymity and verifiability is challenging. However, even if a satisfactory technical solution were found, electronic forms of voting challenge the democratic process in other ways. Whereas technology once had the reputation of contributing to explicit goals in an instrumental way, philosophers have now realised that it also changes our experience and existence in ways that had not been intended. Moreover, many requirements of procedures to be automated are implicit, and the automated versions may thereby “act‿ differently. In this contribution, we analyse how electronic voting shapes democratic forms of voting from the perspective of technological mediation. First of all, we introduce the requirements that are generally accepted to apply to the voting process. We then zoom in on the history of electronic voting in the Netherlands, explain how the country finally abolished electronic voting, and recast the problems encountered in terms of implicit requirements. We then generalise the notion of implicit requirements to include broader forms of changes in human experience and existence, by referring to the philosophical work on technological mediation. Applying this theory to electronic voting, especially Internet voting, we identify challenges that we need to face, should electronic voting come back on the political agenda.

AB - Several European countries have been involved in the implementation of electronic forms of voting in elections. This may include electronic voting machines at polling stations, Internet voting, or both. In the former, the registration and counting of the votes is done electronically, but authentication of the voter and the protection of the secrecy of the ballot still depend on traditional means. In the latter, voting is done remotely from any computer, and the polling station is abolished as protective space. To allow observation of the elections (Vollan, 2006), it is deemed essential that the voting procedure be verifiable. From a technical perspective, the combination of voter anonymity and verifiability is challenging. However, even if a satisfactory technical solution were found, electronic forms of voting challenge the democratic process in other ways. Whereas technology once had the reputation of contributing to explicit goals in an instrumental way, philosophers have now realised that it also changes our experience and existence in ways that had not been intended. Moreover, many requirements of procedures to be automated are implicit, and the automated versions may thereby “act‿ differently. In this contribution, we analyse how electronic voting shapes democratic forms of voting from the perspective of technological mediation. First of all, we introduce the requirements that are generally accepted to apply to the voting process. We then zoom in on the history of electronic voting in the Netherlands, explain how the country finally abolished electronic voting, and recast the problems encountered in terms of implicit requirements. We then generalise the notion of implicit requirements to include broader forms of changes in human experience and existence, by referring to the philosophical work on technological mediation. Applying this theory to electronic voting, especially Internet voting, we identify challenges that we need to face, should electronic voting come back on the political agenda.

KW - METIS-279126

KW - IR-75229

KW - Electronic voting

KW - EWI-19089

KW - Technological mediation

KW - SCS-Cybersecurity

KW - implicit requirements

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_24

DO - 10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_24

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-90-6704-730-2

T3 - Information Technology and Law Series

SP - 439

EP - 452

BT - Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government

PB - T.M.C. Asser Press

ER -

Pieters W. How devices transform voting. In van der Hof S, Groothuis MM, editors, Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. 2011. p. 439-452. (Information Technology and Law Series; 20). Available from, DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_24