Abstract
Little is known about how design choices in teacher dashboards (i.e, digital tools that summarize and visualize information to support the teacher in the teaching process)impact teachers’ monitoring and interpretation of critical events. Therefore, this study examined how designs that offer different levels of supportimpactpre-serviceteachers’monitoring.Threedashboarddesigns(from least to most supported: mirroring, alerting, and advising) were compared. In three conditions teachers (n = 50) processed nine teacher dashboards of a particular design. Teachers were required to detect the critical situations in each dashboard. Results demonstrated that the alerting dashboards resulted in more successful problem detection than the mirroring dashboards. Though advising dashboards, in theory, offer more support, no additional benefit over alerting dashboards was found.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | International Collaboration toward Educational Innovation for All |
| Subtitle of host publication | Overarching Research, Development, and Practices - 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2022 |
| Editors | Clark Chinn, Edna Tan, Carol Chan, Yael Kali |
| Publisher | International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) |
| Pages | 1425-1428 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781737330653 |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
| Event | 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2022 - Virtual, Online, Japan Duration: 6 Jun 2022 → 10 Jun 2022 Conference number: 16 |
Conference
| Conference | 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2022 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | ICLS 2022 |
| Country/Territory | Japan |
| City | Virtual, Online |
| Period | 6/06/22 → 10/06/22 |