How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design

Jan Maarten Schraagen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

85 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research on expert-novice differences has mainly focused on how experts solve familiar problems. We know far less about the skills and knowledge used by experts when they are confronted with novel problems within their area of expertise. This article discusses a study in which verbal protocols were taken from subjects of various expertise designing an experiment in an area with which they were unfamiliar. The results showed that even when domain knowledge is lacking, experts solve a novel problem within their area of expertise by dividing the problem into a number of subproblems that are solved in a specified order. The lack of domain knowledge is compensated for by using abstract knowledge structures and domain-specific heuristic strategies. However, the quality of their solutions is considerably lower than the quality attained by experts who were familiar with the type of problem to be solved. The results suggest that when experts are confronted with novel problems as compared with familiar problems, their form of reasoning remains intact, but the content of their reasoning suffers due to lack of domain knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-309
Number of pages25
JournalCognitive science
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this