How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input

B.L.A. van de Laar, D. Plass - Oude Bos, B. Reuderink, Mannes Poel, Antinus Nijholt

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) provide a valuable new input modality within human- computer interaction systems, but like other body-based inputs, the system recognition of input commands is far from perfect. This raises important questions, such as: What level of control should such an interface be able to provide? What is the relationship between actual and perceived control? And in the case of applications for entertainment in which fun is an important part of user experience, should we even aim for perfect control, or is the optimum elsewhere? In this experiment the user plays a simple game in which a hamster has to be guided to the exit of a maze, in which the amount of control the user has over the hamster is varied. The variation of control through confusion matrices makes it possible to simulate the experience of using a BCI, while using the traditional keyboard for input. After each session the user �lled out a short questionnaire on fun and perceived control. Analysis of the data showed that the perceived control of the user could largely be explained by the amount of control in the respective session. As expected, user frustration decreases with increasing control. Moreover, the results indicate that the relation between fun and control is not linear. Although in the beginning fun does increase with improved control, the level of fun drops again just before perfect control is reached. This poses new insights for developers of games wanting to incorporate some form of BCI in their game: for creating a fun game, unreliable input can be used to create a challenge for the user.
Original languageUndefined
Place of PublicationEnschede
PublisherCentre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)
StatePublished - 2011

Publication series

NameCTIT Technical Report Series
PublisherUniversity of Twente, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology
No.TR-CTIT-11-25
ISSN (Print)1381-3625

Fingerprint

Brain computer interface
Human computer interaction
Experiments

Keywords

  • IR-79645
  • METIS-279673
  • Games
  • Fun
  • EWI-21469
  • Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)
  • Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
  • User Experience

Cite this

van de Laar, B. L. A., Plass - Oude Bos, D., Reuderink, B., Poel, M., & Nijholt, A. (2011). How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input. (CTIT Technical Report Series; No. TR-CTIT-11-25). Enschede: Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT).

van de Laar, B.L.A.; Plass - Oude Bos, D.; Reuderink, B.; Poel, Mannes; Nijholt, Antinus / How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input.

Enschede : Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), 2011. (CTIT Technical Report Series; No. TR-CTIT-11-25).

Research output: ProfessionalReport

@book{b153c1b40ca5430db0ec745c2498cbfb,
title = "How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input",
abstract = "Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) provide a valuable new input modality within human- computer interaction systems, but like other body-based inputs, the system recognition of input commands is far from perfect. This raises important questions, such as: What level of control should such an interface be able to provide? What is the relationship between actual and perceived control? And in the case of applications for entertainment in which fun is an important part of user experience, should we even aim for perfect control, or is the optimum elsewhere? In this experiment the user plays a simple game in which a hamster has to be guided to the exit of a maze, in which the amount of control the user has over the hamster is varied. The variation of control through confusion matrices makes it possible to simulate the experience of using a BCI, while using the traditional keyboard for input. After each session the user �lled out a short questionnaire on fun and perceived control. Analysis of the data showed that the perceived control of the user could largely be explained by the amount of control in the respective session. As expected, user frustration decreases with increasing control. Moreover, the results indicate that the relation between fun and control is not linear. Although in the beginning fun does increase with improved control, the level of fun drops again just before perfect control is reached. This poses new insights for developers of games wanting to incorporate some form of BCI in their game: for creating a fun game, unreliable input can be used to create a challenge for the user.",
keywords = "IR-79645, METIS-279673, Games, Fun, EWI-21469, Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), User Experience",
author = "{van de Laar}, B.L.A. and {Plass - Oude Bos}, D. and B. Reuderink and Mannes Poel and Antinus Nijholt",
year = "2011",
series = "CTIT Technical Report Series",
publisher = "Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)",
number = "TR-CTIT-11-25",
address = "Netherlands",

}

van de Laar, BLA, Plass - Oude Bos, D, Reuderink, B, Poel, M & Nijholt, A 2011, How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input. CTIT Technical Report Series, no. TR-CTIT-11-25, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), Enschede.

How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input. / van de Laar, B.L.A.; Plass - Oude Bos, D.; Reuderink, B.; Poel, Mannes; Nijholt, Antinus.

Enschede : Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), 2011. (CTIT Technical Report Series; No. TR-CTIT-11-25).

Research output: ProfessionalReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input

AU - van de Laar,B.L.A.

AU - Plass - Oude Bos,D.

AU - Reuderink,B.

AU - Poel,Mannes

AU - Nijholt,Antinus

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) provide a valuable new input modality within human- computer interaction systems, but like other body-based inputs, the system recognition of input commands is far from perfect. This raises important questions, such as: What level of control should such an interface be able to provide? What is the relationship between actual and perceived control? And in the case of applications for entertainment in which fun is an important part of user experience, should we even aim for perfect control, or is the optimum elsewhere? In this experiment the user plays a simple game in which a hamster has to be guided to the exit of a maze, in which the amount of control the user has over the hamster is varied. The variation of control through confusion matrices makes it possible to simulate the experience of using a BCI, while using the traditional keyboard for input. After each session the user �lled out a short questionnaire on fun and perceived control. Analysis of the data showed that the perceived control of the user could largely be explained by the amount of control in the respective session. As expected, user frustration decreases with increasing control. Moreover, the results indicate that the relation between fun and control is not linear. Although in the beginning fun does increase with improved control, the level of fun drops again just before perfect control is reached. This poses new insights for developers of games wanting to incorporate some form of BCI in their game: for creating a fun game, unreliable input can be used to create a challenge for the user.

AB - Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) provide a valuable new input modality within human- computer interaction systems, but like other body-based inputs, the system recognition of input commands is far from perfect. This raises important questions, such as: What level of control should such an interface be able to provide? What is the relationship between actual and perceived control? And in the case of applications for entertainment in which fun is an important part of user experience, should we even aim for perfect control, or is the optimum elsewhere? In this experiment the user plays a simple game in which a hamster has to be guided to the exit of a maze, in which the amount of control the user has over the hamster is varied. The variation of control through confusion matrices makes it possible to simulate the experience of using a BCI, while using the traditional keyboard for input. After each session the user �lled out a short questionnaire on fun and perceived control. Analysis of the data showed that the perceived control of the user could largely be explained by the amount of control in the respective session. As expected, user frustration decreases with increasing control. Moreover, the results indicate that the relation between fun and control is not linear. Although in the beginning fun does increase with improved control, the level of fun drops again just before perfect control is reached. This poses new insights for developers of games wanting to incorporate some form of BCI in their game: for creating a fun game, unreliable input can be used to create a challenge for the user.

KW - IR-79645

KW - METIS-279673

KW - Games

KW - Fun

KW - EWI-21469

KW - Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)

KW - Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)

KW - User Experience

M3 - Report

T3 - CTIT Technical Report Series

BT - How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input

PB - Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)

ER -

van de Laar BLA, Plass - Oude Bos D, Reuderink B, Poel M, Nijholt A. How much control is enough? Optimizing fun with unreliable input. Enschede: Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), 2011. (CTIT Technical Report Series; TR-CTIT-11-25).