How Scientific Instruments Speak: A Hermeneutics of Technological Mediations in (Neuro-)Scientific Practice

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this dissertation, I develop a philosophical account of the role of scientific instruments in scientific practice with a specific focus on the neurosciences. I conceptualize scientific instruments as mediating technologies, a notion derived from the approach of postphenomenology developed in current philosophy of technology. In this specific understanding, scientific instruments are not understood as mute instruments that allow to better realize pre-existing human goals and projects, but as mediating how human beings relate to the world, thereby shaping their experience and understanding of reality. Based on this conceptualization, I develop an account of mediating technologies that is specific to the practice of science.
Investigating the role of mediating technologies in scientific practice requires a focus on a specific type of practice. My focus is on an area of science that has been rapidly growing in the last decades: the (cognitive) neurosciences. There are two main reasons for focusing on this specific area. Firstly, the development of the neurosciences into a ‘Big Science’ ran parallel with the development of advanced imaging technologies allowing to visualize brain activity. This makes it an excellent area to study how the neurosciences and the objects that neuroscientists speak about are shaped in relation with technologies. Secondly, the neurosciences currently draw a lot of public attention and media coverage, often conveying the message that increasingly mental phenomena are demystified by the neurosciences and can be explained purely in materialist terms. The enormous public interest in scientific explanations of the mind make some suggest that we currently witness a ‘neurohype’. This makes it pivotal to understand how the objects that neuroscientists investigate and make claims about are shaped by the technologies used. This dissertation contributes to developing such an understanding through a detailed study of the mediating role of brain stimulation and brain imaging technologies in neuroscientific practice.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • University of Twente
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Verbeek, Peter-Paul C.C., Supervisor
  • te Molder, Hedwig F.M., Supervisor
Award date17 Oct 2019
Place of PublicationEnschede
Publisher
Print ISBNs978-90-365-4838-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

hermeneutics
mediation
neurosciences
brain
earning a doctorate
science
public interest
witness
coverage
human being

Keywords

  • philosophy of science
  • philosophy of technology
  • postphenomenology
  • neuroscience

Cite this

@phdthesis{4e2638775aee4577ba4d1c848f495ae6,
title = "How Scientific Instruments Speak: A Hermeneutics of Technological Mediations in (Neuro-)Scientific Practice",
abstract = "In this dissertation, I develop a philosophical account of the role of scientific instruments in scientific practice with a specific focus on the neurosciences. I conceptualize scientific instruments as mediating technologies, a notion derived from the approach of postphenomenology developed in current philosophy of technology. In this specific understanding, scientific instruments are not understood as mute instruments that allow to better realize pre-existing human goals and projects, but as mediating how human beings relate to the world, thereby shaping their experience and understanding of reality. Based on this conceptualization, I develop an account of mediating technologies that is specific to the practice of science. Investigating the role of mediating technologies in scientific practice requires a focus on a specific type of practice. My focus is on an area of science that has been rapidly growing in the last decades: the (cognitive) neurosciences. There are two main reasons for focusing on this specific area. Firstly, the development of the neurosciences into a ‘Big Science’ ran parallel with the development of advanced imaging technologies allowing to visualize brain activity. This makes it an excellent area to study how the neurosciences and the objects that neuroscientists speak about are shaped in relation with technologies. Secondly, the neurosciences currently draw a lot of public attention and media coverage, often conveying the message that increasingly mental phenomena are demystified by the neurosciences and can be explained purely in materialist terms. The enormous public interest in scientific explanations of the mind make some suggest that we currently witness a ‘neurohype’. This makes it pivotal to understand how the objects that neuroscientists investigate and make claims about are shaped by the technologies used. This dissertation contributes to developing such an understanding through a detailed study of the mediating role of brain stimulation and brain imaging technologies in neuroscientific practice.",
keywords = "philosophy of science, philosophy of technology, postphenomenology, neuroscience",
author = "{de Boer}, {Sebastiaan Oege Mathijs}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3990/1.9789036548380",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-365-4838-0",
publisher = "University of Twente",
address = "Netherlands",
school = "University of Twente",

}

How Scientific Instruments Speak : A Hermeneutics of Technological Mediations in (Neuro-)Scientific Practice. / de Boer, Sebastiaan Oege Mathijs.

Enschede : University of Twente, 2019. 299 p.

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

TY - THES

T1 - How Scientific Instruments Speak

T2 - A Hermeneutics of Technological Mediations in (Neuro-)Scientific Practice

AU - de Boer, Sebastiaan Oege Mathijs

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In this dissertation, I develop a philosophical account of the role of scientific instruments in scientific practice with a specific focus on the neurosciences. I conceptualize scientific instruments as mediating technologies, a notion derived from the approach of postphenomenology developed in current philosophy of technology. In this specific understanding, scientific instruments are not understood as mute instruments that allow to better realize pre-existing human goals and projects, but as mediating how human beings relate to the world, thereby shaping their experience and understanding of reality. Based on this conceptualization, I develop an account of mediating technologies that is specific to the practice of science. Investigating the role of mediating technologies in scientific practice requires a focus on a specific type of practice. My focus is on an area of science that has been rapidly growing in the last decades: the (cognitive) neurosciences. There are two main reasons for focusing on this specific area. Firstly, the development of the neurosciences into a ‘Big Science’ ran parallel with the development of advanced imaging technologies allowing to visualize brain activity. This makes it an excellent area to study how the neurosciences and the objects that neuroscientists speak about are shaped in relation with technologies. Secondly, the neurosciences currently draw a lot of public attention and media coverage, often conveying the message that increasingly mental phenomena are demystified by the neurosciences and can be explained purely in materialist terms. The enormous public interest in scientific explanations of the mind make some suggest that we currently witness a ‘neurohype’. This makes it pivotal to understand how the objects that neuroscientists investigate and make claims about are shaped by the technologies used. This dissertation contributes to developing such an understanding through a detailed study of the mediating role of brain stimulation and brain imaging technologies in neuroscientific practice.

AB - In this dissertation, I develop a philosophical account of the role of scientific instruments in scientific practice with a specific focus on the neurosciences. I conceptualize scientific instruments as mediating technologies, a notion derived from the approach of postphenomenology developed in current philosophy of technology. In this specific understanding, scientific instruments are not understood as mute instruments that allow to better realize pre-existing human goals and projects, but as mediating how human beings relate to the world, thereby shaping their experience and understanding of reality. Based on this conceptualization, I develop an account of mediating technologies that is specific to the practice of science. Investigating the role of mediating technologies in scientific practice requires a focus on a specific type of practice. My focus is on an area of science that has been rapidly growing in the last decades: the (cognitive) neurosciences. There are two main reasons for focusing on this specific area. Firstly, the development of the neurosciences into a ‘Big Science’ ran parallel with the development of advanced imaging technologies allowing to visualize brain activity. This makes it an excellent area to study how the neurosciences and the objects that neuroscientists speak about are shaped in relation with technologies. Secondly, the neurosciences currently draw a lot of public attention and media coverage, often conveying the message that increasingly mental phenomena are demystified by the neurosciences and can be explained purely in materialist terms. The enormous public interest in scientific explanations of the mind make some suggest that we currently witness a ‘neurohype’. This makes it pivotal to understand how the objects that neuroscientists investigate and make claims about are shaped by the technologies used. This dissertation contributes to developing such an understanding through a detailed study of the mediating role of brain stimulation and brain imaging technologies in neuroscientific practice.

KW - philosophy of science

KW - philosophy of technology

KW - postphenomenology

KW - neuroscience

U2 - 10.3990/1.9789036548380

DO - 10.3990/1.9789036548380

M3 - PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

SN - 978-90-365-4838-0

PB - University of Twente

CY - Enschede

ER -