How Should We Estimate the Performance Effect of Management? Comparing Impacts of Public Managers’ and Frontline Employees’ Perceptions of Management

Nathan Favero, Simon Calmar Andersen, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O'Toole, Soren C. Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many areas of public management research are dominated by a top-focused perspective in which emphasis is placed on the notion that managers themselves are usually the best sources of information about managerial behavior. Outside of the leadership literature, managers are also the typical survey respondents in public management studies. An alternative perspective on management can be provided by subordinates’ perceptions of what management is doing. Surveys of subordinates and of managers each pose potential advantages and potential disadvantages when it comes to measuring management, and each approach is likely to prove more fruitful for measuring certain management functions. Using a unique data set of parallel surveys on management with managers and their subordinates as respondents, we examine the differences and relationships between Danish school managers’ and teachers’ perceptions of management functions and the implications of such relationships for organizational performance. We find a surprisingly low correlation between manager and teacher responses regarding the same management functions. Teacher responses are better predictors of student performance for management aspects that are visible to and mediated by teachers. However, manager responses better predict performance for manager expectations that are less visible to employees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-130
Number of pages26
JournalInternational public management journal
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date9 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

employee
manager
management
performance
public management
teacher
Employee perceptions
Managers
Frontline employees
source of information
leadership
school
student

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

Favero, Nathan ; Andersen, Simon Calmar ; Meier, Kenneth J. ; O'Toole, Laurence J. ; Winter, Soren C. / How Should We Estimate the Performance Effect of Management? Comparing Impacts of Public Managers’ and Frontline Employees’ Perceptions of Management. In: International public management journal. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 105-130.
@article{da0185bb69764e08a58264569696ac3a,
title = "How Should We Estimate the Performance Effect of Management?: Comparing Impacts of Public Managers’ and Frontline Employees’ Perceptions of Management",
abstract = "Many areas of public management research are dominated by a top-focused perspective in which emphasis is placed on the notion that managers themselves are usually the best sources of information about managerial behavior. Outside of the leadership literature, managers are also the typical survey respondents in public management studies. An alternative perspective on management can be provided by subordinates’ perceptions of what management is doing. Surveys of subordinates and of managers each pose potential advantages and potential disadvantages when it comes to measuring management, and each approach is likely to prove more fruitful for measuring certain management functions. Using a unique data set of parallel surveys on management with managers and their subordinates as respondents, we examine the differences and relationships between Danish school managers’ and teachers’ perceptions of management functions and the implications of such relationships for organizational performance. We find a surprisingly low correlation between manager and teacher responses regarding the same management functions. Teacher responses are better predictors of student performance for management aspects that are visible to and mediated by teachers. However, manager responses better predict performance for manager expectations that are less visible to employees.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "Nathan Favero and Andersen, {Simon Calmar} and Meier, {Kenneth J.} and O'Toole, {Laurence J.} and Winter, {Soren C.}",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/10967494.2016.1236763",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "105--130",
journal = "International public management journal",
issn = "1096-7494",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

How Should We Estimate the Performance Effect of Management? Comparing Impacts of Public Managers’ and Frontline Employees’ Perceptions of Management. / Favero, Nathan; Andersen, Simon Calmar; Meier, Kenneth J.; O'Toole, Laurence J.; Winter, Soren C.

In: International public management journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2018, p. 105-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Should We Estimate the Performance Effect of Management?

T2 - Comparing Impacts of Public Managers’ and Frontline Employees’ Perceptions of Management

AU - Favero, Nathan

AU - Andersen, Simon Calmar

AU - Meier, Kenneth J.

AU - O'Toole, Laurence J.

AU - Winter, Soren C.

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Many areas of public management research are dominated by a top-focused perspective in which emphasis is placed on the notion that managers themselves are usually the best sources of information about managerial behavior. Outside of the leadership literature, managers are also the typical survey respondents in public management studies. An alternative perspective on management can be provided by subordinates’ perceptions of what management is doing. Surveys of subordinates and of managers each pose potential advantages and potential disadvantages when it comes to measuring management, and each approach is likely to prove more fruitful for measuring certain management functions. Using a unique data set of parallel surveys on management with managers and their subordinates as respondents, we examine the differences and relationships between Danish school managers’ and teachers’ perceptions of management functions and the implications of such relationships for organizational performance. We find a surprisingly low correlation between manager and teacher responses regarding the same management functions. Teacher responses are better predictors of student performance for management aspects that are visible to and mediated by teachers. However, manager responses better predict performance for manager expectations that are less visible to employees.

AB - Many areas of public management research are dominated by a top-focused perspective in which emphasis is placed on the notion that managers themselves are usually the best sources of information about managerial behavior. Outside of the leadership literature, managers are also the typical survey respondents in public management studies. An alternative perspective on management can be provided by subordinates’ perceptions of what management is doing. Surveys of subordinates and of managers each pose potential advantages and potential disadvantages when it comes to measuring management, and each approach is likely to prove more fruitful for measuring certain management functions. Using a unique data set of parallel surveys on management with managers and their subordinates as respondents, we examine the differences and relationships between Danish school managers’ and teachers’ perceptions of management functions and the implications of such relationships for organizational performance. We find a surprisingly low correlation between manager and teacher responses regarding the same management functions. Teacher responses are better predictors of student performance for management aspects that are visible to and mediated by teachers. However, manager responses better predict performance for manager expectations that are less visible to employees.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

U2 - 10.1080/10967494.2016.1236763

DO - 10.1080/10967494.2016.1236763

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 105

EP - 130

JO - International public management journal

JF - International public management journal

SN - 1096-7494

IS - 1

ER -