How to write and read a scientific evaluation paper

Roelf J. Wieringa, Johannes M.G. Heerkens, Björn Regnell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

6 Citations (Scopus)
208 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scientific evaluation papers investigate existing problem situations or validate proposed solutions with scientific means, such as by experiment or case study. There is a growing amount of literature about how to report about empirical research in software engineering, but there is still some confusion about the difference between a scientific evaluation paper and other kinds of research papers. This is related to lack of clarity about the relation between empirical research, engineering, and industrial practice. In this minitutorial we give a brief rundown on how to structure a scientific evaluation papers as a special kind of research paper, using experiment reports and case study reports as examples. We give checklists of items that a reader should be able to find in these papers, and sketch the dilemmas that writers and readers of these papers face when applying these checklists.
Original languageUndefined
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 17th International Requirements Engineering Conference
Place of PublicationLos Alamitos
PublisherIEEE
Pages361-364
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)978-0-7695-3761-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009
Event17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2009 - JW Marriott, Atlanta, United States
Duration: 31 Aug 20094 Sep 2009
Conference number: 17
http://eeat.cis.gsu.edu/re09/Home.aspx

Publication series

Name
PublisherIEEE Computer Society Press

Conference

Conference17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2009
Abbreviated titleRE
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta
Period31/08/094/09/09
Internet address

Keywords

  • IR-69584
  • METIS-261571
  • SCS-Services
  • IS-Design science methodology
  • EWI-16195

Cite this