HRM implementation in multinational companies: the dynamics of multifaceted scenarios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study explores why the subsidiary line managers of multinational companies (MNCs) implement HRM practices differently than intended by headquarters. HRM implementation is understood as a process in which one has to differentiate between a range of multifaceted HRM implementation scenarios. We build on a single case study in a Dutch subsidiary of a US engineering company that we characterised as an extreme case. The analysis comprises in-depth interviews with HRM and line managers and a study of policy documents using multiple iteration cycles with the software ATLAS.ti. Line managers engage in a range of behaviours: they ignore, deviate, imitate, internalise, initiate and/or integrate the delegated practices because they fail to see the value of the content of the practice and the process of execution. The HRM implementation scenarios found, although distinctive, often overlap, evolve or coexist in a dynamic HRM implementation process. We predict a support role for HRM managers in which they facilitate line managers in deviating from intended practices, and initiating new ones, in order to increase the likelihood of successful internalisation and integration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-536
JournalEuropean journal of international management
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

manager
scenario
internalization
Scenarios
Multinational companies
Line managers
engineering
interview
Values
Subsidiaries
HRM practices
Internalization
In-depth interviews
Managers
Implementation process
Software
Headquarters

Cite this

@article{e016498fbfb54d5e84fba4079e99f9cf,
title = "HRM implementation in multinational companies: the dynamics of multifaceted scenarios",
abstract = "This study explores why the subsidiary line managers of multinational companies (MNCs) implement HRM practices differently than intended by headquarters. HRM implementation is understood as a process in which one has to differentiate between a range of multifaceted HRM implementation scenarios. We build on a single case study in a Dutch subsidiary of a US engineering company that we characterised as an extreme case. The analysis comprises in-depth interviews with HRM and line managers and a study of policy documents using multiple iteration cycles with the software ATLAS.ti. Line managers engage in a range of behaviours: they ignore, deviate, imitate, internalise, initiate and/or integrate the delegated practices because they fail to see the value of the content of the practice and the process of execution. The HRM implementation scenarios found, although distinctive, often overlap, evolve or coexist in a dynamic HRM implementation process. We predict a support role for HRM managers in which they facilitate line managers in deviating from intended practices, and initiating new ones, in order to increase the likelihood of successful internalisation and integration.",
author = "Anna Bos-Nehles and Tanya Bondarouk and Soren Labrenz",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1504/EJIM.2017.10007655",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "515--536",
journal = "European journal of international management",
issn = "1751-6757",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

HRM implementation in multinational companies : the dynamics of multifaceted scenarios. / Bos-Nehles, Anna; Bondarouk, Tanya; Labrenz, Soren.

In: European journal of international management, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2017, p. 515-536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - HRM implementation in multinational companies

T2 - the dynamics of multifaceted scenarios

AU - Bos-Nehles, Anna

AU - Bondarouk, Tanya

AU - Labrenz, Soren

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This study explores why the subsidiary line managers of multinational companies (MNCs) implement HRM practices differently than intended by headquarters. HRM implementation is understood as a process in which one has to differentiate between a range of multifaceted HRM implementation scenarios. We build on a single case study in a Dutch subsidiary of a US engineering company that we characterised as an extreme case. The analysis comprises in-depth interviews with HRM and line managers and a study of policy documents using multiple iteration cycles with the software ATLAS.ti. Line managers engage in a range of behaviours: they ignore, deviate, imitate, internalise, initiate and/or integrate the delegated practices because they fail to see the value of the content of the practice and the process of execution. The HRM implementation scenarios found, although distinctive, often overlap, evolve or coexist in a dynamic HRM implementation process. We predict a support role for HRM managers in which they facilitate line managers in deviating from intended practices, and initiating new ones, in order to increase the likelihood of successful internalisation and integration.

AB - This study explores why the subsidiary line managers of multinational companies (MNCs) implement HRM practices differently than intended by headquarters. HRM implementation is understood as a process in which one has to differentiate between a range of multifaceted HRM implementation scenarios. We build on a single case study in a Dutch subsidiary of a US engineering company that we characterised as an extreme case. The analysis comprises in-depth interviews with HRM and line managers and a study of policy documents using multiple iteration cycles with the software ATLAS.ti. Line managers engage in a range of behaviours: they ignore, deviate, imitate, internalise, initiate and/or integrate the delegated practices because they fail to see the value of the content of the practice and the process of execution. The HRM implementation scenarios found, although distinctive, often overlap, evolve or coexist in a dynamic HRM implementation process. We predict a support role for HRM managers in which they facilitate line managers in deviating from intended practices, and initiating new ones, in order to increase the likelihood of successful internalisation and integration.

U2 - 10.1504/EJIM.2017.10007655

DO - 10.1504/EJIM.2017.10007655

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 515

EP - 536

JO - European journal of international management

JF - European journal of international management

SN - 1751-6757

IS - 5

ER -