Human Development or Human Enhancement? A Methodological Reflection on Capabilities and the Evaluation of Information Technologies.

Mark Coeckelbergh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Nussbaum’s version of the capability approach is not only a helpful approach to development problems but can also be employed as a general ethical-anthropological framework in ‘advanced’ societies. This paper explores its normative force for evaluating information technologies, with a particular focus on the issue of human enhancement. It suggests that the capability approach can be a useful way of to specify a workable and adequate level of analysis in human enhancement discussions, but argues that any interpretation of what these capabilities mean is itself dependent on (interpretations of) the techno-human practices under discussion. This challenges the capability approach’s means-end dualism concerning the relation between on the one hand technology and on the other hand humans and capabilities. It is argued that instead of facing a choice between development and enhancement, we better reflect on how we want to shape human-technological practices, for instance by using the language of capabilities. For this purpose, we have to engage in a cumbersome hermeneutics that interprets dynamic relations between unstable capabilities, technologies, practices, and values. This requires us to modify the capability approach by highlighting and interpreting its interpretative dimension.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)-
JournalEthics and information technology
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • IR-76105
  • METIS-269278

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Human Development or Human Enhancement? A Methodological Reflection on Capabilities and the Evaluation of Information Technologies.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this