Human intervention in rivers: quantifying the uncertainty of hydraulic model predictions

Koen Daniël Berends

    Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Human intervention in rivers is increasingly supported by computer model predictions. Due to limited observations of extreme events and the challenges related to predicting the future, it is recommended to quantify the uncertainty of model predictions. However, this is is not done in practice as the computational costs for such computations are often prohibitative. It is therefore unknown how model uncertainty affects model predictions of human intervention, even though human intervention in rivers has a large impact on society and the environment. The aim of this thesis is to improve the understanding of uncertainty surrounding model predictions of effect studies. We approached this as follows.
    First, we developed a method to significantly decrease the computational burden of uncertainty quantification (80%-95% in our case studies). Second, we quantified the uncertainty of archetypical spatial interventions and demonstrated that the uncertainty (expressed as the 90% confidence interval) of the effect is between 20% to 40% of the mean effect. So, for an intervention with a average water level decrease of 20 cm, 90% percent of model simulations will be between 17 cm and 23 cm. Next, we studied whether calibration could potentially mitigate the sources of uncertainty. Results showed that this was not the case; in fact, we showed that errors in model assumptions (such as a too simplistic vegetation model) increase uncertainty. Finally we compare model simulations with thirty years of hydraulic observations. Results showed that the uncertainty in observations are too great to discern the effect of human intervention. The accuracy of model simulations could therefore not independently be verified.
    The recommended approach going forward is to explicitly quantify and communicate the uncertainty of model predictions. The methods and insights developed in this thesis contribute toward this goal.
    Original languageEnglish
    QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
    Awarding Institution
    • University of Twente
    Supervisors/Advisors
    • Hulscher, Suzanne J.M.H., Supervisor
    • Warmink, Jord Jurriaan, Co-Supervisor
    Thesis sponsors
    Award date28 Nov 2019
    Place of PublicationEnschede
    Publisher
    Print ISBNs978-90-365-4882-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    Hydraulic models
    Rivers
    Uncertainty
    Water levels
    Hydraulics
    Calibration

    Keywords

    • river
    • intervention
    • Human intervention
    • Hydraulic modeling
    • Hydraulic modelling
    • morphodynamic modeling
    • Uncertainty
    • Uncertainty Analysis
    • Uncertainty quantification
    • Probabilistic Analysis
    • Bayesian nonparametric
    • Glue
    • calibration
    • civil engineering
    • river engineering
    • Flood mitigation

    Cite this

    Berends, Koen Daniël. / Human intervention in rivers : quantifying the uncertainty of hydraulic model predictions. Enschede : University of Twente, 2019. 192 p.
    @phdthesis{7fc445d043954965817946de07461bae,
    title = "Human intervention in rivers: quantifying the uncertainty of hydraulic model predictions",
    abstract = "Human intervention in rivers is increasingly supported by computer model predictions. Due to limited observations of extreme events and the challenges related to predicting the future, it is recommended to quantify the uncertainty of model predictions. However, this is is not done in practice as the computational costs for such computations are often prohibitative. It is therefore unknown how model uncertainty affects model predictions of human intervention, even though human intervention in rivers has a large impact on society and the environment. The aim of this thesis is to improve the understanding of uncertainty surrounding model predictions of effect studies. We approached this as follows.First, we developed a method to significantly decrease the computational burden of uncertainty quantification (80{\%}-95{\%} in our case studies). Second, we quantified the uncertainty of archetypical spatial interventions and demonstrated that the uncertainty (expressed as the 90{\%} confidence interval) of the effect is between 20{\%} to 40{\%} of the mean effect. So, for an intervention with a average water level decrease of 20 cm, 90{\%} percent of model simulations will be between 17 cm and 23 cm. Next, we studied whether calibration could potentially mitigate the sources of uncertainty. Results showed that this was not the case; in fact, we showed that errors in model assumptions (such as a too simplistic vegetation model) increase uncertainty. Finally we compare model simulations with thirty years of hydraulic observations. Results showed that the uncertainty in observations are too great to discern the effect of human intervention. The accuracy of model simulations could therefore not independently be verified.The recommended approach going forward is to explicitly quantify and communicate the uncertainty of model predictions. The methods and insights developed in this thesis contribute toward this goal.",
    keywords = "river, intervention, Human intervention, Hydraulic modeling, Hydraulic modelling, morphodynamic modeling, Uncertainty, Uncertainty Analysis, Uncertainty quantification, Probabilistic Analysis, Bayesian nonparametric, Glue, calibration, civil engineering, river engineering, Flood mitigation",
    author = "Berends, {Koen Dani{\"e}l}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "11",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.3990/1.9789036548823",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-90-365-4882-3",
    publisher = "University of Twente",
    address = "Netherlands",
    school = "University of Twente",

    }

    Human intervention in rivers : quantifying the uncertainty of hydraulic model predictions. / Berends, Koen Daniël.

    Enschede : University of Twente, 2019. 192 p.

    Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

    TY - THES

    T1 - Human intervention in rivers

    T2 - quantifying the uncertainty of hydraulic model predictions

    AU - Berends, Koen Daniël

    PY - 2019/11/28

    Y1 - 2019/11/28

    N2 - Human intervention in rivers is increasingly supported by computer model predictions. Due to limited observations of extreme events and the challenges related to predicting the future, it is recommended to quantify the uncertainty of model predictions. However, this is is not done in practice as the computational costs for such computations are often prohibitative. It is therefore unknown how model uncertainty affects model predictions of human intervention, even though human intervention in rivers has a large impact on society and the environment. The aim of this thesis is to improve the understanding of uncertainty surrounding model predictions of effect studies. We approached this as follows.First, we developed a method to significantly decrease the computational burden of uncertainty quantification (80%-95% in our case studies). Second, we quantified the uncertainty of archetypical spatial interventions and demonstrated that the uncertainty (expressed as the 90% confidence interval) of the effect is between 20% to 40% of the mean effect. So, for an intervention with a average water level decrease of 20 cm, 90% percent of model simulations will be between 17 cm and 23 cm. Next, we studied whether calibration could potentially mitigate the sources of uncertainty. Results showed that this was not the case; in fact, we showed that errors in model assumptions (such as a too simplistic vegetation model) increase uncertainty. Finally we compare model simulations with thirty years of hydraulic observations. Results showed that the uncertainty in observations are too great to discern the effect of human intervention. The accuracy of model simulations could therefore not independently be verified.The recommended approach going forward is to explicitly quantify and communicate the uncertainty of model predictions. The methods and insights developed in this thesis contribute toward this goal.

    AB - Human intervention in rivers is increasingly supported by computer model predictions. Due to limited observations of extreme events and the challenges related to predicting the future, it is recommended to quantify the uncertainty of model predictions. However, this is is not done in practice as the computational costs for such computations are often prohibitative. It is therefore unknown how model uncertainty affects model predictions of human intervention, even though human intervention in rivers has a large impact on society and the environment. The aim of this thesis is to improve the understanding of uncertainty surrounding model predictions of effect studies. We approached this as follows.First, we developed a method to significantly decrease the computational burden of uncertainty quantification (80%-95% in our case studies). Second, we quantified the uncertainty of archetypical spatial interventions and demonstrated that the uncertainty (expressed as the 90% confidence interval) of the effect is between 20% to 40% of the mean effect. So, for an intervention with a average water level decrease of 20 cm, 90% percent of model simulations will be between 17 cm and 23 cm. Next, we studied whether calibration could potentially mitigate the sources of uncertainty. Results showed that this was not the case; in fact, we showed that errors in model assumptions (such as a too simplistic vegetation model) increase uncertainty. Finally we compare model simulations with thirty years of hydraulic observations. Results showed that the uncertainty in observations are too great to discern the effect of human intervention. The accuracy of model simulations could therefore not independently be verified.The recommended approach going forward is to explicitly quantify and communicate the uncertainty of model predictions. The methods and insights developed in this thesis contribute toward this goal.

    KW - river

    KW - intervention

    KW - Human intervention

    KW - Hydraulic modeling

    KW - Hydraulic modelling

    KW - morphodynamic modeling

    KW - Uncertainty

    KW - Uncertainty Analysis

    KW - Uncertainty quantification

    KW - Probabilistic Analysis

    KW - Bayesian nonparametric

    KW - Glue

    KW - calibration

    KW - civil engineering

    KW - river engineering

    KW - Flood mitigation

    U2 - 10.3990/1.9789036548823

    DO - 10.3990/1.9789036548823

    M3 - PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

    SN - 978-90-365-4882-3

    PB - University of Twente

    CY - Enschede

    ER -