Hybrid biometric template protection: Resolving the agony of choice between bloom filters and homomorphic encryption

Amina Bassit*, Florian Hahn, Raymond Veldhuis, Andreas Peter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Bloom filters (BFs) and homomorphic encryption (HE) are prominent techniques used to design biometric template protection (BTP) schemes that aim to protect sensitive biometric information during storage and biometric comparison. However, the pros and cons of BF- and HE-based BTPs are not well studied in literature. We investigate the strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches since both seem promising from a theoretical viewpoint. Our key insight is to extend our theoretical investigation to cover the practical case of iris recognition on the ground that iris (1) benefits from the alignment-free property of BFs and (2) induces huge computational burdens when implemented in the HE-encrypted domain. BF-based BTPs can be implemented to be either fast with high recognition accuracy while missing the important privacy property of ‘unlinkability’, or to be fast with unlinkability-property while missing the high accuracy. HE-based BTPs, on the other hand, are highly secure, achieve good accuracy, and meet the unlinkability-property, but they are much slower than BF-based approaches. As a synthesis, we propose a hybrid BTP scheme that combines the good properties of BFs and HE, ensuring unlinkability and high recognition accuracy, while being about seven times faster than the traditional HE-based approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-444
Number of pages15
JournalIET biometrics
Volume11
Issue number5
Early online date16 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hybrid biometric template protection: Resolving the agony of choice between bloom filters and homomorphic encryption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this