TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid biometric template protection
T2 - Resolving the agony of choice between bloom filters and homomorphic encryption
AU - Bassit, Amina
AU - Hahn, Florian
AU - Veldhuis, Raymond
AU - Peter, Andreas
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the PriMa project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 860315. We would like to thank Christoph Busch and Marcel Grimmer for their inspiring lecture that motivated the research carried out. We also would like to express our gratitude to Jascha Kolberg for providing us with the binary features of the IITD database.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the PriMa project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie grant agreement No. 860315. We would like to thank Christoph Busch and Marcel Grimmer for their inspiring lecture that motivated the research carried out. We also would like to express our gratitude to Jascha Kolberg for providing us with the binary features of the IITD database.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. IET Biometrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Bloom filters (BFs) and homomorphic encryption (HE) are prominent techniques used to design biometric template protection (BTP) schemes that aim to protect sensitive biometric information during storage and biometric comparison. However, the pros and cons of BF- and HE-based BTPs are not well studied in literature. We investigate the strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches since both seem promising from a theoretical viewpoint. Our key insight is to extend our theoretical investigation to cover the practical case of iris recognition on the ground that iris (1) benefits from the alignment-free property of BFs and (2) induces huge computational burdens when implemented in the HE-encrypted domain. BF-based BTPs can be implemented to be either fast with high recognition accuracy while missing the important privacy property of ‘unlinkability’, or to be fast with unlinkability-property while missing the high accuracy. HE-based BTPs, on the other hand, are highly secure, achieve good accuracy, and meet the unlinkability-property, but they are much slower than BF-based approaches. As a synthesis, we propose a hybrid BTP scheme that combines the good properties of BFs and HE, ensuring unlinkability and high recognition accuracy, while being about seven times faster than the traditional HE-based approach.
AB - Bloom filters (BFs) and homomorphic encryption (HE) are prominent techniques used to design biometric template protection (BTP) schemes that aim to protect sensitive biometric information during storage and biometric comparison. However, the pros and cons of BF- and HE-based BTPs are not well studied in literature. We investigate the strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches since both seem promising from a theoretical viewpoint. Our key insight is to extend our theoretical investigation to cover the practical case of iris recognition on the ground that iris (1) benefits from the alignment-free property of BFs and (2) induces huge computational burdens when implemented in the HE-encrypted domain. BF-based BTPs can be implemented to be either fast with high recognition accuracy while missing the important privacy property of ‘unlinkability’, or to be fast with unlinkability-property while missing the high accuracy. HE-based BTPs, on the other hand, are highly secure, achieve good accuracy, and meet the unlinkability-property, but they are much slower than BF-based approaches. As a synthesis, we propose a hybrid BTP scheme that combines the good properties of BFs and HE, ensuring unlinkability and high recognition accuracy, while being about seven times faster than the traditional HE-based approach.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131939085
U2 - 10.1049/bme2.12075
DO - 10.1049/bme2.12075
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85131939085
SN - 2047-4938
VL - 11
SP - 430
EP - 444
JO - IET biometrics
JF - IET biometrics
IS - 5
ER -