Hybrid computational intelligence models for improvement gully erosion assessment

Alireza Arabameri*, Wei Chen, L. Lombardo, Thomas Blaschke, Dieu Tien Bui

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
54 Downloads (Pure)


Gullying is a type of soil erosion that currently represents a major threat at the societal scale and will likely increase in the future. In Iran, soil erosion, and specifically gullying, is already causing significant distress to local economies by affecting agricultural productivity and infrastructure. Recognizing this threat has recently led the Iranian geomorphology community to focus on the problem across the whole country. This study is in line with other efforts where the optimal method to map gully-prone areas is sought by testing state-of-the-art machine learning tools. In this study, we compare the performance of three machine learning algorithms, namely Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA), logistic model tree (LMT) and naïve Bayes tree (NBTree). We also introduce three novel ensemble models by combining the aforementioned base classifiers to the Random SubSpace (RS) meta-classifier namely RS-FLDA, RS-LMT and RS-NBTree. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), true skill statistics (TSS) and kappa criteria are used for calibration (goodness-of-fit) and validation (prediction accuracy) datasets to compare the performance of the different algorithms. In addition to susceptibility mapping, we also study the association between gully erosion and a set of morphometric, hydrologic and thematic properties by adopting the evidential belief function (EBF). The results indicate that hydrology-related factors contribute the most to gully formation, which is also confirmed by the susceptibility patterns displayed by the RS-NBTree ensemble. The RS-NBTree is the model that outperforms the other five models, as indicated by the prediction accuracy (area under curve (AUC) = 0.898, Kappa = 0.748 and TSS = 0.697), and goodness-of-fit (AUC = 0.780, Kappa = 0.682 and TSS = 0.618). The analyses are performed with the same gully presence/absence balanced modeling design. Therefore, the differences in performance are dependent on the algorithm architecture. Overall, the EBF model can detect strong and reasonable dependencies towards gully-prone conditions. The RS-NBTree ensemble model performed significantly better than the others, suggesting greater flexibility towards unknown data, which may support the applications of these methods in transferable susceptibility models in areas that are potentially erodible but currently lack gully data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number140
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalRemote sensing
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020


  • Ensemble
  • Environmental management
  • Land degradation
  • Machine learning
  • Soil conservation


Dive into the research topics of 'Hybrid computational intelligence models for improvement gully erosion assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this