Ideal angular orientation of selected 64-channel multi beam Lidars for mobile mapping systems

B. Alsadik*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
266 Downloads (Pure)


Lidar technology is thriving nowadays for different applications mainly for autonomous navigation, mapping, and smart city technology. Lidars vary in different aspects and can be: multi beam, single beam, spinning, solid state, full 360 field of view FOV, single or multi pulse returns, and many other geometric and radiometric aspects. Users and developers in the mapping industry are continuously looking for new released Lidars having high properties of output density, coverage, and accuracy while keeping a lower cost. Accordingly, every Lidar type should be well evaluated for the final intended mapping aim. This evaluation is not easy to implement in practice because of the need to have all the investigated Lidars available in hand and integrated into a ready to use mapping system. Furthermore, to have a fair comparison; it is necessary to ensure the test applied in the same environment at the same travelling path among other conditions. In this paper, we are evaluating two state-of-the-art multi beam Lidar types: Ouster OS-1-64 and Hesai Pandar64 for mapping applications. The evaluation of the Lidar types is applied in a simulation environment which approximates reality. The paper shows the determination of the ideal orientation angle for the two Lidars by assessing the density, coverage, and accuracy and presenting clear performance quantifications and conclusions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number510
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalRemote sensing
Issue number3
Early online date5 Feb 2020
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020


  • Lidar
  • point cloud density
  • point cloud coverage
  • mobile mapping systems
  • 3D simulation


Dive into the research topics of 'Ideal angular orientation of selected 64-channel multi beam Lidars for mobile mapping systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this