Identifying viable theoretical frameworks with essential parameters for real-time and real world alcohol craving research: a systematic review of craving models

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Substance use is known to be episodic, dynamic, complex, and highly influenced by the environment, therefore a situational and momentary focus to alcohol craving research is appropriate. Current advances in mobile and wearable technology provide novel opportunities for craving research. However, the lack of consensus within craving theory impedes the identification and prioritization of parameters to be monitored. The aim of this study is to critically review current craving models in order to determine viable theoretical frameworks of alcohol craving and its essential parameters.

Methods: Eighteen models of craving were reviewed by applying a literature search with a five-step strategy that accounted for the momentary nature of craving and included a snowballing search and a key term extraction algorithm. Based on this review, multiple decision criteria were defined upon which to evaluate the models.

Results: Six models for alcohol craving were supported by sufficient empirical research to be eligible. The inferences drawn on these six models resulted in three decision criteria: the model should (1) incorporate negative affect as a predictor of relapse; (2) explain that dependent drinkers have a higher attentional bias towards alcohol cues than nondependent drinkers; (3) incorporate increased risk of relapse with heightened stress levels.

Conclusions: The affective processing model of negative reinforcement, the cognitive processing model, the incentive sensitization theory of addiction and the theory of neural opponent motivation are classified as viable theoretical frameworks, resulting in negative affect and stress as relevant parameters to include in real-time craving monitoring research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-51
Number of pages17
JournalAddiction Research and Theory
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Research
Motivation
Craving
Recurrence
Empirical Research
Cues
Consensus
Technology

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Alcohol cues
  • Attentional bias
  • Negative affect
  • Relapse
  • Stress
  • Alcohol craving

Cite this

@article{e18bba39a1e4488894da80698e16ce1d,
title = "Identifying viable theoretical frameworks with essential parameters for real-time and real world alcohol craving research: a systematic review of craving models",
abstract = "Background: Substance use is known to be episodic, dynamic, complex, and highly influenced by the environment, therefore a situational and momentary focus to alcohol craving research is appropriate. Current advances in mobile and wearable technology provide novel opportunities for craving research. However, the lack of consensus within craving theory impedes the identification and prioritization of parameters to be monitored. The aim of this study is to critically review current craving models in order to determine viable theoretical frameworks of alcohol craving and its essential parameters.Methods: Eighteen models of craving were reviewed by applying a literature search with a five-step strategy that accounted for the momentary nature of craving and included a snowballing search and a key term extraction algorithm. Based on this review, multiple decision criteria were defined upon which to evaluate the models.Results: Six models for alcohol craving were supported by sufficient empirical research to be eligible. The inferences drawn on these six models resulted in three decision criteria: the model should (1) incorporate negative affect as a predictor of relapse; (2) explain that dependent drinkers have a higher attentional bias towards alcohol cues than nondependent drinkers; (3) incorporate increased risk of relapse with heightened stress levels.Conclusions: The affective processing model of negative reinforcement, the cognitive processing model, the incentive sensitization theory of addiction and the theory of neural opponent motivation are classified as viable theoretical frameworks, resulting in negative affect and stress as relevant parameters to include in real-time craving monitoring research.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Alcohol cues, Attentional bias, Negative affect, Relapse, Stress, Alcohol craving",
author = "{van Lier}, {Hendrika G.} and Pieterse, {Marcel E.} and Schraagen, {Jan Maarten C.} and Postel, {Marloes G.} and Vollenbroek-Hutten, {Miriam M.R.} and {de Haan}, {Hein A.} and Noordzij, {Matthijs L.}",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/16066359.2017.1309525",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "35--51",
journal = "Addiction Research and Theory",
issn = "1606-6359",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying viable theoretical frameworks with essential parameters for real-time and real world alcohol craving research

T2 - a systematic review of craving models

AU - van Lier, Hendrika G.

AU - Pieterse, Marcel E.

AU - Schraagen, Jan Maarten C.

AU - Postel, Marloes G.

AU - Vollenbroek-Hutten, Miriam M.R.

AU - de Haan, Hein A.

AU - Noordzij, Matthijs L.

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: Substance use is known to be episodic, dynamic, complex, and highly influenced by the environment, therefore a situational and momentary focus to alcohol craving research is appropriate. Current advances in mobile and wearable technology provide novel opportunities for craving research. However, the lack of consensus within craving theory impedes the identification and prioritization of parameters to be monitored. The aim of this study is to critically review current craving models in order to determine viable theoretical frameworks of alcohol craving and its essential parameters.Methods: Eighteen models of craving were reviewed by applying a literature search with a five-step strategy that accounted for the momentary nature of craving and included a snowballing search and a key term extraction algorithm. Based on this review, multiple decision criteria were defined upon which to evaluate the models.Results: Six models for alcohol craving were supported by sufficient empirical research to be eligible. The inferences drawn on these six models resulted in three decision criteria: the model should (1) incorporate negative affect as a predictor of relapse; (2) explain that dependent drinkers have a higher attentional bias towards alcohol cues than nondependent drinkers; (3) incorporate increased risk of relapse with heightened stress levels.Conclusions: The affective processing model of negative reinforcement, the cognitive processing model, the incentive sensitization theory of addiction and the theory of neural opponent motivation are classified as viable theoretical frameworks, resulting in negative affect and stress as relevant parameters to include in real-time craving monitoring research.

AB - Background: Substance use is known to be episodic, dynamic, complex, and highly influenced by the environment, therefore a situational and momentary focus to alcohol craving research is appropriate. Current advances in mobile and wearable technology provide novel opportunities for craving research. However, the lack of consensus within craving theory impedes the identification and prioritization of parameters to be monitored. The aim of this study is to critically review current craving models in order to determine viable theoretical frameworks of alcohol craving and its essential parameters.Methods: Eighteen models of craving were reviewed by applying a literature search with a five-step strategy that accounted for the momentary nature of craving and included a snowballing search and a key term extraction algorithm. Based on this review, multiple decision criteria were defined upon which to evaluate the models.Results: Six models for alcohol craving were supported by sufficient empirical research to be eligible. The inferences drawn on these six models resulted in three decision criteria: the model should (1) incorporate negative affect as a predictor of relapse; (2) explain that dependent drinkers have a higher attentional bias towards alcohol cues than nondependent drinkers; (3) incorporate increased risk of relapse with heightened stress levels.Conclusions: The affective processing model of negative reinforcement, the cognitive processing model, the incentive sensitization theory of addiction and the theory of neural opponent motivation are classified as viable theoretical frameworks, resulting in negative affect and stress as relevant parameters to include in real-time craving monitoring research.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Alcohol cues

KW - Attentional bias

KW - Negative affect

KW - Relapse

KW - Stress

KW - Alcohol craving

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017471603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/16066359.2017.1309525

DO - 10.1080/16066359.2017.1309525

M3 - Review article

VL - 26

SP - 35

EP - 51

JO - Addiction Research and Theory

JF - Addiction Research and Theory

SN - 1606-6359

IS - 1

ER -